The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: A survey
Abstract
This is a survey on graph visualization and navigation techniques, as used in information visualization. Graphs appear in numerous applications such as Web browsing, state-transition diagrams, and data structures. The ability to visualize and to navigate in these potentially large, abstract graphs is often a crucial part of an application. Information visualization has specific requirements, which means that this survey approaches the results of traditional graph drawing from a different perspective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Graph embedding techniques, applications, and performance: A survey
Goyal, P., & Ferrara, E. (2018) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2018.03.022 · Cited by 1,801
Comorbidity: a network perspective
Cramer, A. O. J., Waldorp, L. J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Borsboom, D. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x09991567 · Cited by 1,575
Cui, P., Wang, X., Pei, J., & Zhu, W. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2849727 · Cited by 1,274
Network Representation Learning: A Survey
Zhang, D., Yin, J., Zhu, X., & Zhang, C. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2018.2850013 · Cited by 714
Smart Cities: A Survey on Data Management, Security, and Enabling Technologies
Gharaibeh, A., Salahuddin, M. A., Hussini, S. J., Khreishah, A., Khalil, I., Guizani, M., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2736886 · Cited by 628
Visual learning analytics of educational data: A systematic literature review and research agenda
Vieira, C., Parsons, P., & Byrd, V. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.018 · Cited by 316
Isayev, O., Fourches, D., Muratov, E. N., Oses, C., Rasch, K., Tropsha, A., & Curtarolo, S. (2015) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm503507h · Cited by 300
On the evolution of mobile platform ecosystem structure and strategy
Basole, R. C., & Karla, J. (2011) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-011-0174-4 · Cited by 192
How do visual explanations foster end users' appropriate trust in machine learning?
Yang, F., Huang, Z., Scholtz, J., & Arendt, D. L. (2020) · Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3377325.3377480 · Cited by 200
Barsky, A., Gardy, J. L., Hancock, R. E. W., & Munzner, T. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm057 · Cited by 175
A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research on Epistemic Network Analysis in Education
Elmoazen, R., Saqr, M., Tedre, M., & Hirsto, L. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3149812 · Cited by 103
VisANT 3.0: new modules for pathway visualization, editing, prediction and construction
Hu, Z., Ng, D. M., Yamada, T., Chen, C., Kawashima, S., Mellor, J., Linghu, B., Kanehisa, M., Stuart, J. M., & DeLisi, C. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm295 · Cited by 76
Stacksplorer: call graph navigation helps increasing code maintenance efficiency
Karrer, T., Krämer, J.-P., Diehl, J., Hartmann, B., & Borchers, J. (2011) · Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology · doi:10.1145/2047196.2047225 · Cited by 48
Hu, F., Liu, W., Tsai, S.-B., Gao, J., Bin, N., & Chen, Q. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10030667 · Cited by 27
SEA: Segment-enrich-annotate paradigm for adapting dialog-based content for improved accessibility
Candan, K. S., Dönderler, M. E., Hedgpeth, T., Kim, J. W., Li, Q., & Sapino, M. L. (2009) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1508850.1508853 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Herman, I., Melancon, G., & Marshall, M. S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-43
- ISSN
- 1077-2626 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2147468287
- Cited by
- 1,538
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
