Transcoder architectures for video coding
Abstract
This paper discusses the problem of transcoding H.263-based video streams. Two different models for transcoding are examined, rate reduction and resolution reduction. Results show that the computational complexity of the basic transcoding model can be reduced for each model by, on average, 39% and 23% without significant lose in quality. Comparisons with the scaleable coding model are also shown.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RC4 is considered cryptographically insecure by the IETF.
“As RC4 is now considered cryptographically insecure by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) [6]”
From Effectiveness of crypto-transcoding for H.264/AVC and HEVC video bit-streams (2019) · cites this paper as [6]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 7 · Cited by 150
- Authors
- Bjork, N., & Christopoulos, C.
- Affiliations
- Ericsson (Sweden) (SE)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 88-98
- ISSN
- 0098-3063 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000223636
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Video Coding and Compression Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Data Compression Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Keywords
- video transcoding, H.263, rate reduction, resolution reduction, scalable video coding, computational complexity reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
