The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cryptanalysis of a remote user authentication scheme using smart cards
Abstract
We present a cryptanalysis of a remote user authentication scheme proposed by Hwang and Li (see ibid., vol.46, no.1, p.28-31, 2000). We show that Hwang-Li's scheme is breakable. A legitimate user can impersonate other legal users and pass the system authentication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A public key cryptosystem and a signature scheme based on discrete logarithms
Elgamal, T. (1985) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1985.1057074 · Cited by 8,059
Cited by
A dynamic ID-based remote user authentication scheme
Das, M. L., Saxena, A., & Gulati, V. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2004.1309441 · Cited by 434
A secure dynamic ID based remote user authentication scheme for multi-server environment
Liao, Y.-P., & Wang, S.-S. (2009) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.csi.2007.10.007 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, C.-K., & Cheng, L. M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 992-993
- ISSN
- 0098-3063 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022284361
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cryptanalysis of a remote user authentication scheme using smart cards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/30.920451
- The paper
- Chan, C.-K., & Cheng, L. M. (2000). Cryptanalysis of a remote user authentication scheme using smart cards. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/30.920451
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
