The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Machine learning approaches to estimating software development effort
Abstract
Accurate estimation of software development effort is critical in software engineering. Underestimates lead to time pressures that may compromise full functional development and thorough testing of software. In contrast, overestimates can result in noncompetitive contract bids and/or over allocation of development resources and personnel. As a result, many models for estimating software development effort have been proposed. This article describes two methods of machine learning, which we use to build estimators of software development effort from historical data. Our experiments indicate that these techniques are competitive with traditional estimators on one dataset, but also illustrate that these methods are sensitive to the data on which they are trained. This cautionary note applies to any model-construction strategy that relies on historical data. All such models for software effort estimation should be evaluated by exploring model sensitivity on a variety of historical data.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Automatic Construction of Decision Trees from Data: A Multi-Disciplinary Survey
Murthy, S. K. (1998) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1023/a:1009744630224 · Cited by 991
The 2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems
(2016) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2016.2545826 · Cited by 308
Data mining techniques for software effort estimation: a comparative study
Dejaeger, K., Verbeke, W., Martens, D., & Baesens, B. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2011.55 · Cited by 224
An empirical analysis of data preprocessing for machine learning-based software cost estimation
Huang, J., Li, Y.-F., & Xie, M. (2015) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2015.07.004 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Srinivasan, K., & Fisher, D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 126-137
- ISSN
- 0098-5589 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133442842
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning approaches to estimating software development effort. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/32.345828
- The paper
- Srinivasan, K., & Fisher, D. (1995). Machine learning approaches to estimating software development effort. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/32.345828
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.