Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 976

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A taxonomy of scheduling in general-purpose distributed computing systems

Casavant, T.L., Kuhl, J.G.·1988·IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

Abstract

One measure of the usefulness of a general-purpose distributed computing system is the system's ability to provide a level of performance commensurate to the degree of multiplicity of resources present in the system. A taxonomy of approaches to the resource management problem is presented in an attempt to provide a common terminology and classification mechanism necessary in addressing this problem. The taxonomy, while presented and discussed in terms of distributed scheduling, is also applicable to most types of resource management.>

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/32.4634

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 976

Metadata

Authors
Casavant, T. L., & Kuhl, J. G.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Published
1988
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
141-154
ISSN
0098-5589 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152408640
Cited by
976
References
1
FWCI
12.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A taxonomy of scheduling in general-purpose distributed computing systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/32.4634
The paper
Casavant, T. L., & Kuhl, J. G. (1988). A taxonomy of scheduling in general-purpose distributed computing systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/32.4634

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.