The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A unified framework for coupling measurement in object-oriented systems
Abstract
The increasing importance being placed on software measurement has led to an increased amount of research developing new software measures. Given the importance of object-oriented development techniques, one specific area where this has occurred is coupling measurement in object-oriented systems. However, despite a very interesting and rich body of work, there is little understanding of the motivation and empirical hypotheses behind many of these new measures. It is often difficult to determine how such measures relate to one another and for which application they can be used. As a consequence, it is very difficult for practitioners and researchers to obtain a clear picture of the state of the art in order to select or define measures for object-oriented systems. This situation is addressed and clarified through several different activities. First, a standardized terminology and formalism for expressing measures is provided which ensures that all measures using it are expressed in a fully consistent and operational manner. Second, to provide a structured synthesis, a review of the existing frameworks and measures for coupling measurement in object-oriented systems takes place. Third, a unified framework, based on the issues discovered in the review, is provided and all existing measures are then classified according to this framework. This paper contributes to an increased understanding of the state-of-the-art.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Exploring the relationships between design measures and software quality in object-oriented systems
Briand, L. C., Wüst, J., Daly, J. W., & Victor Porter, D. (2000) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/s0164-1212(99)00102-8 · Cited by 710
Self-citationPredicting defects using network analysis on dependency graphs
Zimmermann, T., & Nagappan, N. (2008) · Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Software engineering - ICSE '08 · doi:10.1145/1368088.1368161 · Cited by 580
Object-Oriented Metrics in Practice
(2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-39538-5 · Cited by 527
Olague, H. M., Etzkorn, L. H., Gholston, S., & Quattlebaum, S. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2007.1015 · Cited by 304
An industrial survey of requirements interdependencies in software product release planning
Carlshamre, P., Sandahl, K., Lindvall, M., Regnell, B., & Natt och Dag, J. (2001) · Proceedings Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering · doi:10.1109/isre.2001.948547 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Briand, L. C., Daly, J. W., & Wust, J. K.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-121
- ISSN
- 0098-5589 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-3520
- 2326-3881
- OpenAlex
- W2132762162
- Cited by
- 814
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 56.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A unified framework for coupling measurement in object-oriented systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/32.748920
- The paper
- Briand, L. C., Daly, J. W., & Wust, J. K. (1999). A unified framework for coupling measurement in object-oriented systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/32.748920
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.