Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of the efficiency of deterministic and stochastic algorithms for visual reconstruction

Blake, A.·1989·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

Piecewise continuous reconstruction of real-valued data can be formulated in terms of nonconvex optimization problems. Both stochastic and deterministic algorithms have been devised to solve them. The simplest such reconstruction process is the weak string. Exact solutions can be obtained for it and are used to determine the success or failure of the algorithms under precisely controlled conditions. It is concluded that the deterministic algorithm (graduated nonconvexity) outstrips stochastic (simulated annealing) algorithms both in computational efficiency and in problem-solving power.>

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/34.23109

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
Blake, A.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
1989
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
2-12
ISSN
0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063494315
Cited by
178
References
0
FWCI
16.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of the efficiency of deterministic and stochastic algorithms for visual reconstruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/34.23109
The paper
Blake, A. (1989). Comparison of the efficiency of deterministic and stochastic algorithms for visual reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.23109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.