The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Periodicity, directionality, and randomness: Wold features for image modeling and retrieval
Abstract
One of the fundamental challenges in pattern recognition is choosing a set of features appropriate to a class of problems. In applications such as database retrieval, it is important that image features used in pattern comparison provide good measures of image perceptual similarities. We present an image model with a new set of features that address the challenge of perceptual similarity. The model is based on the 2D Wold decomposition of homogeneous random fields. The three resulting mutually orthogonal subfields have perceptual properties which can be described as "periodicity," "directionality," and "randomness," approximating what are indicated to be the three most important dimensions of human texture perception. The method presented improves upon earlier Wold-based models in its tolerance to a variety of local inhomogeneities which arise in natural textures and its invariance under image transformation such as rotation. An image retrieval algorithm based on the new texture model is presented. Different types of image features are aggregated for similarity comparison by using a Bayesian probabilistic approach. The, effectiveness of the Wold model at retrieving perceptually similar natural textures is demonstrated in comparison to that of two other well-known pattern recognition methods. The Wold model appears to offer a perceptually more satisfying measure of pattern similarity while exceeding the performance of these other methods by traditional pattern recognition criteria. Examples of natural scene Wold texture modeling are also presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A survey of content-based image retrieval with high-level semantics
Liu, Y., Zhang, D., Lu, G., & Ma, W.-Y. (2007) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2006.04.045 · Cited by 1,696
A sparse texture representation using local affine regions
Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., & Ponce, J. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.151 · Cited by 1,123
Perceptual Metrics for Image Database Navigation
Rubner, Y., & Tomasi, C. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3343-3 · Cited by 296
Dimitrov, A., & Golparvar-Fard, M. (2014) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2013.11.002 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, F., & Picard, R. W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 722-733
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089366864
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Periodicity, directionality, and randomness: Wold features for image modeling and retrieval. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/34.506794
- The paper
- Liu, F., & Picard, R. W. (1996). Periodicity, directionality, and randomness: Wold features for image modeling and retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.506794
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.