Autonomous exploration: driven by uncertainty
Abstract
Passively accepting measurements of the world is not enough, as the data we obtain is always incomplete, and the inferences made from it uncertain to a degree which is often unacceptable. If we are to build machines that operate autonomously, they will always be faced with this dilemma, and can only be successful if they play a much more active role. This paper presents such a machine. It deliberately seeks out those parts of the world which maximize the fidelity of its internal representations, and keeps searching until those representations are acceptable. We call this paradigm autonomous exploration, and the machine an autonomous explorer. This paper has two major contributions. The first is a theory that tells us how to explore, and which confirms the intuitive ideas we have put forward previously. The second is an implementation of that theory. In our laboratory, we have constructed a working autonomous explorer and here, for the first time, show it in action. The system is entirely bottom-up and does not depend on any a priori knowledge of the environment. To our knowledge, it is the first to have successfully closed the loop between gaze planning and the inference of complex 3D models.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Active perception is a critical component of efficient perception and decision-making in humans and advanced embodied agents.
“Among the many components of perception, active percep- tion, the process of selective acquisition of sensory infor- mation to achieve specific goals, has proven essential for efficient information gathering and decision making in com- plex environments (Aloimonos et al., 1988; Ballard, 1991; Whaite & Ferrie, 1997).”
From ACTIVE-o3: Empowering MLLMs with Active Perception via Pure Reinforcement Learning (2025) · cites this paper as Whaite & Ferrie, 1997
Early foundational work demonstrated that by actively controlling parameters such as camera pose or sensor configuration, agents can transform otherwise ill-posed perception problems into well-posed ones.
“Early founda- tional work (Aloimonos et al., 1988; Ballard, 1991; Whaite & Ferrie, 1997)—often termed”
From ACTIVE-o3: Empowering MLLMs with Active Perception via Pure Reinforcement Learning (2025) · cites this paper as Whaite & Ferrie, 1997
Cites
Aloimonos, J., Weiss, I., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (1988) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/bf00133571 · Cited by 931 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Information Gain-based Exploration Using Rao-Blackwellized Particle Filters
Stachniss, C., Grisetti, G., & Burgard, W. (2005) · Robotics: Science and Systems I · doi:10.15607/rss.2005.i.009 · Cited by 542 · see citing works
Potential information fields for mobile robot exploration
Vallvé, J., & Andrade-Cetto, J. (2015) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.009 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
ACTIVE-o3: Empowering MLLMs with Active Perception via Pure Reinforcement Learning
Zhu, M., Zhong, H., Zhao, C., Du, Z., Liu, M., Huang, Z., Li, A., Chen, H., Zou, C., Chen, J., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.21457
- Authors
- Whaite, P., & Ferrie, F. P.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 193-205
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103009569
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Keywords
- autonomous exploration, uncertainty, missing data, bottom-up learning, active sensing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review