The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Classification of rotated and scaled textured images using Gaussian Markov random field models
Abstract
Consideration is given to the problem of classifying a test textured image that is obtained from one of C possible parent texture classes, after possibly applying unknown rotation and scale changes to the parent texture. The training texture images (parent classes) are modeled by Gaussian Markov random fields (GMRFs). To classify a rotated and scaled test texture, the rotation and scale changes are incorporated in the texture model through an appropriate transformation of the power spectral density of the GMRF. For the rotated and scaled image, a bona fide likelihood function that shows the explicit dependence of the likelihood function on the GMRF parameters, as well as on the rotation and scale parameters, is derived. Although, in general, the scaled and/or rotated texture does not correspond to a finite-order GMRF, it is possible nonetheless to write down a likelihood function for the image data. The likelihood function of the discrete Fourier transform of the image data corresponds to that of a white nonstationary Gaussian random field, with the variance at each pixel (i,j) being a known function of the rotation, the scale, the GMRF model parameters, and (i,j). The variance is an explicit function of the appropriately sampled power spectral density of the GMRF. The estimation of the rotation and scale parameters is performed in the frequency domain by maximizing the likelihood function associated with the discrete Fourier transform of the image data. Cramer-Rao error bounds on the scale and rotation estimates are easily computed. A modified Bayes decision rule is used to classify a given test image into one of C possible texture classes. The classification power of the method is demonstrated through experimental results on natural textures from the Brodatz album.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Automated Visual Inspection: A Survey
Chin, R. T., & Harlow, C. A. (1982) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1982.4767309 · Cited by 400
Cited by
Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns
Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M., & Maenpaa, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2002.1017623 · Cited by 15,398
Zhang, J., Marszałek, M., Lazebnik, S., & Schmid, C. (2007) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-006-9794-4 · Cited by 1,923
A sparse texture representation using local affine regions
Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., & Ponce, J. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.151 · Cited by 1,123
On conditional and intrinsic autoregressions
BESAG, J., & KOOPERBERG, C. (1995) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.733 · Cited by 732
(1998) · Cited by 540
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, F. S., Fan, Z., & Patel, M. A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192-202
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013252827
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification of rotated and scaled textured images using Gaussian Markov random field models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/34.67648
- The paper
- Cohen, F. S., Fan, Z., & Patel, M. A. (1991). Classification of rotated and scaled textured images using Gaussian Markov random field models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.67648
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.