The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probabilistic data association methods for tracking complex visual objects
Abstract
We describe a framework that explicitly reasons about data association to improve tracking performance in many difficult visual environments. A hierarchy of tracking strategies results from ascribing ambiguous or missing data to: 1) noise-like visual occurrences, 2) persistent, known scene elements (i.e., other tracked objects), or 3) persistent, unknown scene elements. First, we introduce a randomized tracking algorithm adapted from an existing probabilistic data association filter (PDAF) that is resistant to clutter and follows agile motion. The algorithm is applied to three different tracking modalities-homogeneous regions, textured regions, and snakes-and extensibly defined for straightforward inclusion of other methods. Second, we add the capacity to track multiple objects by adapting to vision a joint PDAF which oversees correspondence choices between same-modality trackers and image features. We then derive a related technique that allows mixed tracker modalities and handles object overlaps robustly. Finally, we represent complex objects as conjunctions of cues that are diverse both geometrically (e.g., parts) and qualitatively (e.g., attributes). Rigid and hinge constraints between part trackers and multiple descriptive attributes for individual parts render the whole object more distinctive, reducing susceptibility to mistracking. Results are given for diverse objects such as people, microscopic cells, and chess pieces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems
Kalman, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3662552 · Cited by 31,751
A Computational Approach to Edge Detection
Canny, J. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851 · Cited by 30,004
CONDENSATION—Conditional Density Propagation for Visual Tracking
Isard, M., & Blake, A. (1998) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1008078328650 · Cited by 4,886
Efficient region tracking with parametric models of geometry and illumination
Hager, G. D., & Belhumeur, P. N. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.722606 · Cited by 1,066
Self-citation
Cited by
Comaniciu, D., Ramesh, V., & Meer, P. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2003.1195991 · Cited by 4,560
Visual tracking and recognition using appearance-adaptive models in particle filters
Zhou, S. K., Chellappa, R., & Moghaddam, B. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2004.836152 · Cited by 668
Message Passing Algorithms for Scalable Multitarget Tracking
Meyer, F., Kropfreiter, T., Williams, J. L., Lau, R., Hlawatsch, F., Braca, P., & Win, M. Z. (2018) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2018.2789427 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Rasmussen, C., & Hager, G. D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 560-576
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107401725
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probabilistic data association methods for tracking complex visual objects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/34.927458
- The paper
- Rasmussen, C., & Hager, G. D. (2001). Probabilistic data association methods for tracking complex visual objects. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.927458
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.