The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simplifying fuzzy rule-based models using orthogonal transformation methods
Abstract
An important issue in fuzzy-rule-based modeling is how to select a set of important fuzzy rules from a given rule base. Even though it is conceivable that removal of redundant or less important fuzzy rules from the rule base can result in a compact fuzzy model with better generalizing ability, the decision as to which rules are redundant or less important is not an easy exercise. In this paper, we introduce several orthogonal transformation-based methods that provide new or alternative tools for rule selection. These methods include an orthogonal least squares (OLS) method, an eigenvalue decomposition (ED) method, a singular value decomposition and QR with column pivoting (SVD-QR) method, a total least squares (TLS) method, and a direct singular value decomposition (D-SVD) method. A common attribute of these methods is that they all work on a firing strength matrix and employ some measure index to detect the rules that should be retained and eliminated. We show the performance of these methods by applying them to solving a nonlinear plant modeling problem. Our conclusions based on analysis and simulation can be used as a guideline for choosing a proper rule selection method for a specific application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control
Takagi, T., & Sugeno, M. (1985) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1985.6313399 · Cited by 19,592
ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system
Jang, J.-S. R. (1993) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.256541 · Cited by 16,254
Rogers, S. (1996) · Control Engineering Practice · doi:10.1016/0967-0661(96)82838-3 · Cited by 9,278
Goodall, C. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1988.10488412 · Cited by 8,675
Jolliffe, I. T. (1986) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-1904-8 · Cited by 8,273
Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks
Narendra, K. S., & Parthasarathy, K. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.80202 · Cited by 8,014
Fast Learning in Networks of Locally-Tuned Processing Units
Moody, J., & Darken, C. J. (1989) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.2.281 · Cited by 4,194
Application of fuzzy algorithms for control of simple dynamic plant
Mamdani, E. H. (1974) · Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers · doi:10.1049/piee.1974.0328 · Cited by 4,064
Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks
Chen, S., Cowan, C. F. N., & Grant, P. M. (1991) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.80341 · Cited by 3,362
Cited by
GA-fuzzy modeling and classification: complexity and performance
Setnes, M., & Roubos, H. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/91.873575 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Yen, J., & Wang, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics)
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-24
- ISSN
- 1083-4419 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161171165
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 16.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simplifying fuzzy rule-based models using orthogonal transformation methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/3477.740162
- The paper
- Yen, J., & Wang, L. (1999). Simplifying fuzzy rule-based models using orthogonal transformation methods. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics). https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.740162
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.