The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robust radial basis function neural networks
Abstract
Function approximation has been found in many applications. The radial basis function (RBF) network is one approach which has shown a great promise in this sort of problems because of its faster learning capacity. A traditional RBF network takes Gaussian functions as its basis functions and adopts the least-squares criterion as the objective function, However, it still suffers from two major problems. First, it is difficult to use Gaussian functions to approximate constant values. If a function has nearly constant values in some intervals, the RBF network will be found inefficient in approximating these values. Second, when the training patterns incur a large error, the network will interpolate these training patterns incorrectly. In order to cope with these problems, an RBF network is proposed in this paper which is based on sequences of sigmoidal functions and a robust objective function. The former replaces the Gaussian functions as the basis function of the network so that constant-valued functions can be approximated accurately by an RBF network, while the latter is used to restrain the influence of large errors. Compared with traditional RBF networks, the proposed network demonstrates the following advantages: (1) better capability of approximation to underlying functions; (2) faster learning speed; (3) better size of network; (4) high robustness to outliers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Networks for approximation and learning
Poggio, T., & Girosi, F. (1990) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.58326 · Cited by 3,252
A Gaussian potential function network with hierarchically self-organizing learning
Lee, S., & Kil, R. M. (1991) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(91)90005-p · Cited by 325
A robust backpropagation learning algorithm for function approximation
Chen, D. S., & Jain, R. C. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.286917 · Cited by 302
A constructive method for multivariate function approximation by multilayer perceptrons
Geva, S., & Sitte, J. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.143376 · Cited by 85
Saha, A., Wu, C.-L., & Tang, D.-S. (1993) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/12.257708 · Cited by 28
Cited by
A Survey on Software Fault Localization
Wong, W. E., Gao, R., Li, Y., Abreu, R., & Wotawa, F. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2016.2521368 · Cited by 1,110
Applications of artificial neural networks in chemical engineering
Himmelblau, D. M. (2000) · Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1007/bf02706848 · Cited by 273
Approximation of nonlinear systems with radial basis function neural networks
Schilling, R. J., Carroll, J. J., & Al-Ajlouni, A. F. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.896792 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, C.-C., Chung, P.-C., Tsai, J.-R., & Chang, C.-I.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics)
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 674-685
- ISSN
- 1083-4419 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152907901
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robust radial basis function neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/3477.809023
- The paper
- Lee, C.-C., Chung, P.-C., Tsai, J.-R., & Chang, C.-I. (1999). Robust radial basis function neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics). https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.809023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.