Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 541

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A simplified scheme for obtaining precipitation and vertical hydrometeor profiles from passive microwave sensors

Kummerow, C., Olson, W.S., Giglio, L.·1996·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Abstract

Presents a computationally simple technique for retrieving the precipitation and vertical hydrometeor profiles from downward viewing radiometers. The technique is computationally much less expensive than previous profiling schemes and has been designed specifically to allow for tractability of assumptions. In this paper, the emphasis is placed upon passive microwave applications, but the combination of passive with active microwave sensors, infrared sensors, or other a priori information can be adapted easily to the framework described. The technique is based upon a Bayesian approach. The authors use many realizations of the Goddard Cumulus Ensemble model to establish a prior probability density function of rainfall profiles. Detailed three-dimensional radiative transfer calculations are used to determine the upwelling brightness temperatures from the cloud model to establish the similarity of radiative signatures and thus the probability that a given profile is actually observed. In this study, the authors show that good results may be obtained by weighting profiles from the prior probability density function according to their deviation from the observed brightness temperatures. Examples of the retrieval results are shown for oceanic as well as land situations. Microwave data from the Advanced Microwave Precipitation Radiometer (AMPR) instrument are used to illustrate the retrieval structure results for high-resolution data while SSM/I is used to illustrate satellite applications. Simulations are performed to compare the expected retrieval performance of the SSM/I instrument with that of the upcoming TMI instrument aboard the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) to be launched in August 1997. These simulations show that correlations of /spl sim/0.77 may be obtained for 10-km retrievals of the integrated liquid water content based upon SSM/I channels. This correlation increases to /spl sim/0.90 for the same retrievals using the TMI channels and resolution. Due to the lack of quantitative validation data, hydrometeor profiles cannot be compared directly but are instead converted to an equivalent reflectivity structure and compared to existing radar observations where possible.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/36.536538

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 541

Metadata

Authors
Kummerow, C., Olson, W. S., & Giglio, L.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
1996
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
1213-1232
ISSN
0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139699111
Cited by
541
References
0
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A simplified scheme for obtaining precipitation and vertical hydrometeor profiles from passive microwave sensors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/36.536538
The paper
Kummerow, C., Olson, W. S., & Giglio, L. (1996). A simplified scheme for obtaining precipitation and vertical hydrometeor profiles from passive microwave sensors. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.536538

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.