Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 830

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The MODIS 2.1-μm channel-correlation with visible reflectance for use in remote sensing of aerosol

Kaufman, Y.J., Wald, A.E., Remer, L.A., Bo-Cai Gao, Rong-Rong Li, Flynn, L.·1997·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Abstract

A new technique for remote sensing of aerosol over the land and for atmospheric correction of Earth imagery is developed. It is based on detection of dark surface targets in the blue and red channels, as in previous methods, but uses the 2.1 /spl mu/m channel, instead of the 3.75 /spl mu/m for their detection. A 2.1-/spl mu/m channel is present on ADEOS OCTS and GLI and planned on EOS-MODIS and EOSP, and a similar 2.2-/spl mu/m channel is present on Landsat TM. The advantage of the 2.1-/spl mu/m channel over the 3.75-/spl mu/m channel is that it is not affected by emitted radiation. The 2.1-/spl mu/m channel is transparent to most aerosol types (except dust) and therefore can be used to detect dark surface targets. Correlation between the surface reflection in the blue (0.49 /spl mu/m), red (0.66 /spl mu/m), and 2.1 /spl mu/m is established using atmospherically corrected Landsat TM and AVIRIS aircraft images collected over the Eastern United States, Maine, and California and spectral data obtained from the ground and light aircraft near San Diego, CA. Results from a variety of surface covers show that the surface reflectance at 0.49 /spl mu/m (/spl rho//sub 0.49/) and 0.66 /spl mu/m (/spl rho//sub 0.66/) can be predicted from that at 2.2 /spl mu/m (/spl rho//sub 2.2/) within /spl Delta//spl rho/=/spl plusmn/0.06 for /spl rho//sub 2.2//spl les/0.10, using /spl rho//sub 0.49/=/spl rho//sub 2.2//4 and /spl rho//sub 0.66/=/spl rho//sub 2.2//2. Error in surface reflectance of 0.006 corresponds to an error in remote sensing of aerosol optical thickness, /spl tau/, of /spl Delta//spl tau//spl sim//spl plusmn/0.06. These relationships were validated using spectral data taken close to the surface over vegetated areas in a different biome. This method expends application of dark targets for remote sensing of aerosol to brighter, nonforested vegetation. The higher reflection of the surface at 2.2 /spl mu/m than that of 3.75 /spl mu/m may even enable remote sensing of dust above surfaces with reflectivity /spl rho//sub 2.2/=0.15/spl plusmn/0.05. For this reflectivity range the dust radiative effect at 2.2 /spl mu/m is small, and the surface reflectance in the blue and red channels can be retrieved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/36.628795

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 830

Metadata

Authors
Kaufman, Y. J., Wald, A. E., Remer, L. A., Gao, B.-C., Li, R.-R., & Flynn, L.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
1997
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
1286-1298
ISSN
0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161245744
Cited by
830
References
0
FWCI
9.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The MODIS 2.1-μm channel-correlation with visible reflectance for use in remote sensing of aerosol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/36.628795
The paper
Kaufman, Y. J., Wald, A. E., Remer, L. A., Gao, B.-C., Li, R.-R., & Flynn, L. (1997). The MODIS 2.1-μm channel-correlation with visible reflectance for use in remote sensing of aerosol. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.628795

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.