The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparative evaluation of NOAA/AVHRR vegetation indexes for burned surface detection and mapping
Abstract
The only vegetation index (VI) used in all Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR)-based burned area studies performed so far is the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), in spite of serious known deficiencies caused by sensitivity to atmospheric conditions and soil background. In this study, the ability of various VI to discriminate between burned and unburned surfaces is compared, using burn maps derived from classification of Landsat thematic mapper (TM) imagery as reference data. After assessing the discriminatory potential of the AVHRR channels 1-3, the following indexes were compared: the NDVI, the VI 3 (VI3), the global environmental monitoring index (GEMI), and a modified version of GEMI, called GEMI3, VI performance was assessed in two ways: with a signal-to-noise ratio measure and a measure of the commission error resulting from segmentation of the burned area histograms at a fixed level of omission error. Maps of commission errors were generated for each VI and cross tabulated with a land cover map to identify the land cover types more prone to confusion with burns. The newly proposed index GEMI3 performs best, followed by the GEMI, VI3, and finally NDVI, the latter being clearly out performed, even by channel 2 used individually.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI)
Huete, A. R. (1988) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-x · Cited by 7,948
GEMI: a non-linear index to monitor global vegetation from satellites
Pinty, B., & Verstraete, M. M. (1992) · Plant Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf00031911 · Cited by 741
Mapping burns and natural reforestation using thematic Mapper data
García, M. J. L., & Caselles, V. (1991) · Geocarto International · doi:10.1080/10106049109354290 · Cited by 729
Fire Mosaics in Southern California and Northern Baja California
Minnich, R. A. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.219.4590.1287 · Cited by 399
Do One Percent of the Forest Fires Cause Ninety-Nine Percent of the Damage?
Strauss, D., Bednar, L., & Mees, R. (1989) · Forest Science · doi:10.1093/forestscience/35.2.319 · Cited by 234
The 1 km resolution global data set: needs of the International Geosphere Biosphere Programme†
TOWNSHEND, J. R. G., JUSTICE, C. O., SKOLE, D., MALINGREAU, J.-P., CIHLAR, J., TEILLET, P., SADOWSKI, F., & RUTTENBERG, S. (1994) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431169408954338 · Cited by 213
The Extent and Impact of Forest Fires in Northern Circumpolar Countries
Stocks, B. J. (1991) · Global Biomass Burning · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3286.003.0030 · Cited by 201
Kasischke, E. S., & French, N. H. F. (1995) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(93)00074-j · Cited by 199
Mapping and inventory of forest fires from digital processing of tm data
Chuvieco, E., & Congalton, R. G. (1988) · Geocarto International · doi:10.1080/10106048809354180 · Cited by 169
Monitoring of wildfires in Boreal Forests using large area AVHRR NDVI composite image data
Kasischke, E. S., French, N. H. F., Harrell, P. A., Christensen, N. L., Ustin, S. L., & Barry, D. (1993) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(93)90082-9 · Cited by 156
Cited by
Justice, C. O., Vermote, E., Townshend, J. R. G., Defries, R., Roy, D. P., Hall, D. K., Salomonson, V. V., Privette, J. L., Riggs, G., Strahler, A., et al. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.701075 · Cited by 1,635
A Project for Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity
Eidenshink, J., Schwind, B., Brewer, K., Zhu, Z.-L., Quayle, B., & Howard, S. (2007) · Fire Ecology · doi:10.4996/fireecology.0301003 · Cited by 1,423
EPTING, J., VERBYLA, D., & SORBEL, B. (2005) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2005.03.002 · Cited by 489
BCI: A biophysical composition index for remote sensing of urban environments
Deng, C., & Wu, C. (2012) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.09.009 · Cited by 326
Dwyer, E., Pinnock, S., Gregoire, J.-M., & Pereira, J. M. C. (2000) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/014311600210182 · Cited by 233
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pereira, J. M. C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 217-226
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152504881
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 12.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparative evaluation of NOAA/AVHRR vegetation indexes for burned surface detection and mapping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/36.739156
- The paper
- Pereira, J. M. C. (1999). A comparative evaluation of NOAA/AVHRR vegetation indexes for burned surface detection and mapping. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.739156
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.