Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A comparative evaluation of NOAA/AVHRR vegetation indexes for burned surface detection and mapping

Pereira, J.M.C.·1999·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Abstract

The only vegetation index (VI) used in all Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR)-based burned area studies performed so far is the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), in spite of serious known deficiencies caused by sensitivity to atmospheric conditions and soil background. In this study, the ability of various VI to discriminate between burned and unburned surfaces is compared, using burn maps derived from classification of Landsat thematic mapper (TM) imagery as reference data. After assessing the discriminatory potential of the AVHRR channels 1-3, the following indexes were compared: the NDVI, the VI 3 (VI3), the global environmental monitoring index (GEMI), and a modified version of GEMI, called GEMI3, VI performance was assessed in two ways: with a signal-to-noise ratio measure and a measure of the commission error resulting from segmentation of the burned area histograms at a fixed level of omission error. Maps of commission errors were generated for each VI and cross tabulated with a land cover map to identify the land cover types more prone to confusion with burns. The newly proposed index GEMI3 performs best, followed by the GEMI, VI3, and finally NDVI, the latter being clearly out performed, even by channel 2 used individually.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/36.739156

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Pereira, J. M. C.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
1999
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
217-226
ISSN
0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152504881
Cited by
285
References
18
FWCI
12.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparative evaluation of NOAA/AVHRR vegetation indexes for burned surface detection and mapping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/36.739156
The paper
Pereira, J. M. C. (1999). A comparative evaluation of NOAA/AVHRR vegetation indexes for burned surface detection and mapping. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.739156

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.