The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maximizing land cover classification accuracies produced by decision trees at continental to global scales
Abstract
Classification of land cover from remotely sensed data at continental to global scales requires sophisticated algorithms and feature selection techniques to optimize classifier performance. The authors examine methods to maximize classification accuracies using decision trees to map land cover from multitemporal AVHRR imagery at continental and global scales. As part of their analysis they test the utility of "boosting", a new technique developed to increase classification accuracy by forcing the learning (classification) algorithm to concentrate on those training observations that are most difficult to classify. Their results show that boosting consistently reduces misclassification rates by 20-50% depending on the data set in question, and that most of the benefit gained by boosting is achieved after seven boosting iterations. They also assess the utility of including phenological metrics and geographic position as additional features to the classification algorithm. They find that using derived phenological metrics produces little improvement in classification accuracy relative to using an annual time series of NDVI data, but that geographic position provides substantial power for predicting land cover types at continental and global scales. However, in order to avoid generating spurious classification accuracies using geographic position, training data must be distributed evenly in geographic space.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
The Strength of Weak Learnability
Schapire, R. E. (1990) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116037 · Cited by 4,600
Cited by
Challenges and opportunities in applied machine learning
Brodley, C. E., Rebbapragada, U., Small, K., & Wallace, B. C. (2012) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v33i1.2367 · Cited by 32
Self-citationVegetation Dynamics in Yellowstone’s Northern Range: 1985 to 1999
Savage, S. L., & Lawrence, R. L. (2010) · Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing · doi:10.14358/pers.76.5.547 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedl, M. A., Brodley, C. E., & Strahler, A. H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 969-977
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148022840
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 40.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximizing land cover classification accuracies produced by decision trees at continental to global scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/36.752215
- The paper
- Friedl, M. A., Brodley, C. E., & Strahler, A. H. (1999). Maximizing land cover classification accuracies produced by decision trees at continental to global scales. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.752215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.