Cited by 46Video Coding and Compression TechnologiesImage and Video Quality AssessmentAdvanced Optical Imaging Technologies

Video plus depth compression for mobile 3D services

Open access
Merkle, P., Wang, Y., Muller, K., Smolic, A., Wiegand, T.·2009·2009 3DTV Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video

Abstract

This paper presents a study on video plus depth compression using available MPEG standards and its optimization for mobile 3D services. Video plus depth enables 3D television, but as mobile services are subject to various limitations, including bandwidth, memory, and processing power, efficient compression as well as low complexity view synthesis is required. Two MPEG coding standards are applicable for video plus depth coding, namely MPEG-C Part 3 and H.264 Auxiliary Picture Syntax. These methods are evaluated with respect to the limitations of mobile services and the achievable quality for rendering the second stereo view from compressed video plus depth. In conclusion video plus depth is an interesting alternative to conventional stereo video for mobile 3D services. The results indicate that depth can be compressed at significantly lower bitrates than a secondary video, however at the expense of increased complexity for rendering the second view at the decoder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/3dtv.2009.5069650

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is possible to apply a form of transcoding to encrypted scalable video after packetization by employing unencrypted packet headers to guide truncation of encrypted packet payload.

    “It is also possible [41] to apply a form of transcoding to encrypted scalable video after packetization. This works by employing the unencrypted packet headers to guide truncation of the encrypted packet payload.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 3 · Cited by 46

Authors
Merkle, P., Wang, Y., Muller, K., Smolic, A., & Wiegand, T.
Affiliations
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute (DE)
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich-Hertz-Institut, Image Processing Department, Einsteinufer 37, 10587 Berlin, Germany
Venue
2009 3DTV Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2009-05
Pages
1-4
OpenAlex
W2011380049
Cited by
46
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 15
FWCI
10.82
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • 3DTV-Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (publishedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Video Coding and Compression Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies
Keywords
depth image compression, 3D television, view synthesis, stereo video, bandwidth constraints, decoding complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review