The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automatic tumor segmentation using knowledge-based techniques
Abstract
A system that automatically segments and labels glioblastoma-multiforme tumors in magnetic resonance images (MRI's) of the human brain is presented. The MRI's consist of T1-weighted, proton density, and T2-weighted feature images and are processed by a system which integrates knowledge-based (KB) techniques with multispectral analysis. Initial segmentation is performed by an unsupervised clustering algorithm. The segmented image, along with cluster centers for each class are provided to a rule-based expert system which extracts the intracranial region. Multispectral histogram analysis separates suspected tumor from the rest of the intracranial region, with region analysis used in performing the final tumor labeling. This system has been trained on three volume data sets and tested on thirteen unseen volume data sets acquired from a single MRI system. The KB tumor segmentation was compared with supervised, radiologist-labeled "ground truth" tumor volumes and supervised k-nearest neighbors tumor segmentations. The results of this system generally correspond well to ground truth, both on a per slice basis and more importantly in tracking total tumor volume during treatment over time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Normal brain volume measurements using multispectral MRI segmentation
Vaidyanathan, M., Clarke, L. P., Heidtman, C., Velthuizen, R. P., & Hall, L. O. (1997) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/s0730-725x(96)00244-5 · Cited by 39
Self-citation
Cited by
Brain tumor segmentation with Deep Neural Networks
Havaei, M., Davy, A., Warde-Farley, D., Biard, A., Courville, A., Bengio, Y., Pal, C., Jodoin, P.-M., & Larochelle, H. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.05.004 · Cited by 3,278
A survey of MRI-based medical image analysis for brain tumor studies
Bauer, S., Wiest, R., Nolte, L.-P., & Reyes, M. (2013) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/13/r97 · Cited by 1,036
State of the art survey on MRI brain tumor segmentation
Gordillo, N., Montseny, E., & Sobrevilla, P. (2013) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2013.05.002 · Cited by 697
Quantitative Imaging in Cancer Evolution and Ecology
Gatenby, R. A., Grove, O., & Gillies, R. J. (2013) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.13122697 · Cited by 515
Shin, H.-C., Orton, M. R., Collins, D. J., Doran, S. J., & Leach, M. O. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.277 · Cited by 488
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, M. C., Hall, L. O., Goldgof, D. B., Velthuizen, R., Murtagh, F. R., & Silbiger, M. S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-201
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133467637
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic tumor segmentation using knowledge-based techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/42.700731
- The paper
- Clark, M. C., Hall, L. O., Goldgof, D. B., Velthuizen, R., Murtagh, F. R., & Silbiger, M. S. (1998). Automatic tumor segmentation using knowledge-based techniques. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.700731
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.