The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms
Abstract
Segmenting lesions is a vital step in many computerized mass-detection schemes for digital (or digitized) mammograms. We have developed two novel lesion segmentation techniques-one based on a single feature called the radial gradient index (RGI) and one based on simple probabilistic models to segment mass lesions, or other similar nodular structures, from surrounding background. In both methods a series of image partitions is created using gray-level information as well as prior knowledge of the shape of typical mass lesions. With the former method the partition that maximizes the RGI is selected. In the latter method, probability distributions for gray-levels inside and outside the partitions are estimated, and subsequently used to determine the probability that the image occurred for each given partition. The partition that maximizes this probability is selected as the final lesion partition (contour). We tested these methods against a conventional region growing algorithm using a database of biopsy-proven, malignant lesions and found that the new lesion segmentation algorithms more closely match radiologists' outlines of these lesions. At an overlap threshold of 0.30, gray level region growing correctly delineates 62% of the lesions in our database while the RGI and probabilistic segmentation algorithms correctly segment 92% and 96% of the lesions, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions
Kooi, T., Litjens, G., van Ginneken, B., Gubern-Mérida, A., Sánchez, C. I., Mann, R., den Heeten, A., & Karssemeijer, N. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.07.007 · Cited by 965
Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms
Cheng, H. D., Shi, X. J., Min, R., Hu, L. M., Cai, X. P., & Du, H. N. (2006) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2005.07.006 · Cited by 538
A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images
Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Martí, J., Pérez, E., Pont, J., Denton, E. R. E., & Zwiggelaar, R. (2010) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2009.12.005 · Cited by 398
Dheeba, J., Albert Singh, N., & Tamil Selvi, S. (2014) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2014.01.010 · Cited by 380
Giger, M. L., Chan, H., & Boone, J. (2008) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.3013555 · Cited by 311
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kupinski, M. A., & Giger, M. L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 510-517
- ISSN
- 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169388041
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/42.730396
- The paper
- Kupinski, M. A., & Giger, M. L. (1998). Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.730396
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.