Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 974

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The compact genetic algorithm

Harik, G.R., Lobo, F.G., Goldberg, D.E.·1999·IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation

Abstract

Introduces the compact genetic algorithm (cGA) which represents the population as a probability distribution over the set of solutions and is operationally equivalent to the order-one behavior of the simple GA with uniform crossover. It processes each gene independently and requires less memory than the simple GA. The development of the compact GA is guided by a proper understanding of the role of the GA's parameters and operators. The paper clearly illustrates the mapping of the simple GA's parameters into those of an equivalent compact GA. Computer simulations compare both algorithms in terms of solution quality and speed. Finally, this work raises important questions about the use of information in a genetic algorithm, and its ramifications show us a direction that can lead to the design of more efficient GAs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/4235.797971

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 974

Metadata

Authors
Harik, G. R., Lobo, F. G., & Goldberg, D. E.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
Published
1999
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
287-297
ISSN
1089-778X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148379945
Cited by
974
References
0
FWCI
8.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The compact genetic algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/4235.797971
The paper
Harik, G. R., Lobo, F. G., & Goldberg, D. E. (1999). The compact genetic algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.797971

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.