The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Architecture of field-programmable gate arrays
Abstract
A survey of field-programmable gate array (FPGA) architectures and the programming technologies used to customize them is presented. Programming technologies are compared on the basis of their volatility, size parasitic capacitance, resistance, and process technology complexity. FPGA architectures are divided into two constituents: logic block architectures and routing architectures. A classification of logic blocks based on their granularity is proposed, and several logic blocks used in commercially available FPGAs are described. A brief review of recent results on the effect of logic block granularity on logic density and performance of an FPGA is then presented. Several commercial routing architectures are described in the context of a general routing architecture model. Finally, recent results on the tradeoff between the flexibility of an FPGA routing architecture, its routability, and its density are reviewed.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The roles of FPGAs in reprogrammable systems
Hauck, S. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.663540 · Cited by 373
FPGA and CPLD architectures: a tutorial
Brown, S., & Rose, J. (1996) · IEEE Design & Test of Computers · doi:10.1109/54.500200 · Cited by 363
Self-citationAn All-digital Compute-in-memory FPGA Architecture for Deep Learning Acceleration
Li, Y., Li, X., Shen, H., Fan, J., Xu, Y., & Huang, K. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems · doi:10.1145/3640469 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Rose, J., El Gamal, A., & Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1013-1029
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126255765
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Architecture of field-programmable gate arrays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/5.231340
- The paper
- Rose, J., El Gamal, A., & Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A. (1993). Architecture of field-programmable gate arrays. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.231340
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.