The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motion and structure from feature correspondences: a review
Abstract
We present a review of algorithms and their performance for determining three-dimensional (3D) motion and structure of rigid objects when their corresponding features are known at different times or are viewed by different cameras. Three categories of problems are considered, depending upon whether the features are two (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) and the type of correspondence: a) 3D to 3D (i.e., locations of corresponding features in 3D space are known at two different times), b) 2D to 3D (i.e., locations of features in 3D space and their projection on the camera plane are known, and c) 2D to 2D (i.e., projections of features on the camera plane are known at two different times). Features considered include points, straight lines, curved lines, and corners. Emphasis is on problem formulation, efficient algorithms for solution, existence and uniqueness of solutions, and sensitivity of solutions to noise in the observed data. Algorithms described have been used in a variety of applications. Some of these are: a) positioning and navigating 3D objects in a 3D world, b) camera calibration, i.e., determining location and orientation of a camera by observing 3D features whose location is known, c) estimating motion and structure of moving objects relative to a camera. We mention some of the mathematical techniques borrowed from algebraic geometry, projective geometry, and homotopy theory that are required to solve these problems, list unsolved problems, and give some directions for future research.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
Cited by
Scaramuzza, D., & Fraundorfer, F. (2011) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2011.943233 · Cited by 1,550
Zhang, Z., Deriche, R., Faugeras, O., & Luong, Q.-T. (1995) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(95)00022-4 · Cited by 1,367
Visual SLAM and Structure from Motion in Dynamic Environments: A Survey
Saputra, M. R. U., Markham, A., & Trigoni, N. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3177853 · Cited by 398
Poisson models for extended target and group tracking
Gilholm, K., Godsill, S., Maskell, S., & Salmond, D. (2005) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.618730 · Cited by 278
Vision-based Navigation in Image-Guided Interventions
Mirota, D. J., Ishii, M., & Hager, G. D. (2011) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071910-124757 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, T. S., & Netravali, A. N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 252-268
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119296827
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motion and structure from feature correspondences: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/5.265351
- The paper
- Huang, T. S., & Netravali, A. N. (1994). Motion and structure from feature correspondences: a review. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.265351
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.