Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 572

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multichannel blind identification: from subspace to maximum likelihood methods

Lang Tong, Perreau, S.·1998·Proceedings of the IEEE

Abstract

A review of blind channel estimation algorithms is presented. From the (second-order) moment-based methods to the maximum likelihood approaches, under both statistical and deterministic signal models. We outline basic ideas behind several new developments, the assumptions and identifiability conditions required by these approaches, and the algorithm characteristics and their performance. This review serves as an introductory reference for this currently active research area.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/5.720247

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Cited by

See all 572

Metadata

Authors
Tong, L., & Perreau, S.
Venue
Proceedings of the IEEE
Published
1998
Volume
86
Issue
10
Pages
1951-1968
ISSN
0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107757493
Cited by
572
References
57
FWCI
26.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multichannel blind identification: from subspace to maximum likelihood methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/5.720247
The paper
Tong, L., & Perreau, S. (1998). Multichannel blind identification: from subspace to maximum likelihood methods. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.720247

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.