The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distributed data mining in credit card fraud detection
Abstract
Credit card transactions continue to grow in number, taking an ever-larger share of the US payment system and leading to a higher rate of stolen account numbers and subsequent losses by banks. Improved fraud detection thus has become essential to maintain the viability of the US payment system. Banks have used early fraud warning systems for some years. Large scale data-mining techniques can improve the state of the art in commercial practice. Scalable techniques to analyze massive amounts of transaction data that efficiently compute fraud detectors in a timely manner is an important problem, especially for e-commerce. Besides scalability and efficiency, the fraud-detection task exhibits technical problems that include skewed distributions of training data and nonuniform cost per error, both of which have not been widely studied in the knowledge-discovery and data mining community. In this article, we survey and evaluate a number of techniques that address these three main issues concurrently. Our proposed methods of combining multiple learned fraud detectors under a "cost model" are general and demonstrably useful; our empirical results demonstrate that we can significantly reduce loss due to fraud through distributed data mining of fraud models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wolpert, D. H. (1992) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(05)80023-1 · Cited by 7,951
Improved boosting algorithms using confidence-rated predictions
Schapire, R. E., & Singer, Y. (1998) · Proceedings of the eleventh annual conference on Computational learning theory · doi:10.1145/279943.279960 · Cited by 2,547
AdaCost: Misclassification Cost-Sensitive Boosting
Fan, W., Stolfo, S. J., Zhang, J., & Chan, P. K. (1999) · Cited by 612
Self-citationMargineantu, D. D., & Dietterich, T. G. (1997) · Cited by 553
Chan, P. K., & Stolfo, S. J. (1998) · Cited by 452
Self-citationJAM: java agents for meta-learning over distributed databases
Stolfo, S. J., Prodromidis, A. L., Tselepis, S., Lee, W., Fan, D. W., & Chan, P. K. (1997) · Cited by 285
Self-citationMining in a data-flow environment: experience in network intrusion detection
Lee, W., Stolfo, S. J., & Mok, K. W. (1999) · Proceedings of the fifth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/312129.312212 · Cited by 223
Self-citationMining databases with different schemas: integrating incompatible classifers
Prodromidis, A. L., & Stolfo, S. J. (1998) · Cited by 18
Self-citation(1996)
Cited by
He, H., & Garcia, E. A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2008.239 · Cited by 10,359
Statistical Fraud Detection: A Review
Bolton, R. J., & Hand, D. J. (2002) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1042727940 · Cited by 1,450
Ngai, E. W. T., Hu, Y., Wong, Y. H., Chen, Y., & Sun, X. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.006 · Cited by 1,361
Data preprocessing techniques for classification without discrimination
Kamiran, F., & Calders, T. (2012) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-011-0463-8 · Cited by 1,305
Data mining for credit card fraud: a comparative study
Bhattacharyya, S., Jha, S., Tharakunnel, K., & Westland, J. C. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.008 · Cited by 1,108
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, P. K., Fan, W., Prodromidis, A. L., & Stolfo, S. J.
- Venue
- IEEE Intelligent Systems
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 67-74
- ISSN
- 1094-7167 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160150610
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distributed data mining in credit card fraud detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/5254.809570
- The paper
- Chan, P. K., Fan, W., Prodromidis, A. L., & Stolfo, S. J. (1999). Distributed data mining in credit card fraud detection. IEEE Intelligent Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/5254.809570
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.