The DOI matches its Crossref record.
From generic restoration actions to specific restoration strategies
Abstract
The results presented here reflect work, extending over several years, to identify features underlying restoration processes that are common to almost all utilities and that can serve as guides for preparing and evaluating restoration plans, for developing expert system programs that will be widely useful, and ultimately for improving the effectiveness of restoration practices. Generality is achieved by identifying constituent elements of the process, namely a "target system", "restoration building blocks (RBBs)", "generic restoration actions (GRAs)", and process constraints, and the factors that distinguish among three clearly demarcated stages. This distillation of the constituent elements of the restoration process provides a basis for development of a comprehensive, knowledge-based restoration expert system appropriate to a broad spectrum of power system utilities.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Research on Resilience of Power Systems Under Natural Disasters—A Review
Wang, Y., Chen, C., Wang, J., & Baldick, R. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2015.2429656 · Cited by 1,116
Optimal Generator Start-Up Strategy for Bulk Power System Restoration
Sun, W., Liu, C.-C., & Zhang, L. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2010.2089646 · Cited by 255
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fink, L. H., Liou, K.-L., & Liu, C.-C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 745-752
- ISSN
- 0885-8950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025311604
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From generic restoration actions to specific restoration strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/59.387912
- The paper
- Fink, L. H., Liou, K.-L., & Liu, C.-C. (1995). From generic restoration actions to specific restoration strategies. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.387912
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
