Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 645

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A review of selected optimal power flow literature to 1993. II. Newton, linear programming and interior point methods

Momoh, J.A., El-Hawary, M.E., Adapa, R.·1999·IEEE Transactions on Power Systems

Abstract

For pt.II see ibid., vol.14, no.1, p.96-104 (1999). This second of a two part paper offers a survey of literature on optimal power flow from 1968-93. This part treats Newton-based, linear programming and interior point methods of solution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/59.744495

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 645

Metadata

Authors
Momoh, J. A., El-Hawary, M. E., & Adapa, R.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
Published
1999
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
105-111
ISSN
0885-8950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134869843
Cited by
645
References
0
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of selected optimal power flow literature to 1993. II. Newton, linear programming and interior point methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/59.744495
The paper
Momoh, J. A., El-Hawary, M. E., & Adapa, R. (1999). A review of selected optimal power flow literature to 1993. II. Newton, linear programming and interior point methods. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.744495

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.