Cited by 101Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Cortical implants for the blind

Normann, R.A., Maynard, E.M., Guillory, K.S., Warren, D.J.·1996·IEEE Spectrum

Abstract

Arrays of stimulating electrodes can be placed in the brain itself, in the visual cortex, to bring vision to the profoundly blind. However, when designing such devices one needs to take into consideration the fact that the visual pathway maps images onto cortical structures in a complex and unpredictable way.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/6.490057

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 101

Authors
Normann, R. A., Maynard, E. M., Guillory, K. S., & Warren, D. J.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Venue
IEEE Spectrum
Published
1996-05
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
54-59
ISSN
0018-9235 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044986193
Cited by
101
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Spectrum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
cortical implants, visual prosthesis, visual cortex, stimulating electrodes, electrode arrays, brain-computer interface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review