Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 670

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A simple procedure for pruning back-propagation trained neural networks

Karnin, E.D.·1990·IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks

Abstract

The sensitivity of the global error (cost) function to the inclusion/exclusion of each synapse in the artificial neural network is estimated. Introduced are shadow arrays which keep track of the incremental changes to the synaptic weights during a single pass of back-propagating learning. The synapses are then ordered by decreasing sensitivity numbers so that the network can be efficiently pruned by discarding the last items of the sorted list. Unlike previous approaches, this simple procedure does not require a modification of the cost function, does not interfere with the learning process, and demands a negligible computational overhead.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/72.80236

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 670

Metadata

Authors
Karnin, E. D.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
Published
1990-06
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
239-242
ISSN
1045-9227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097533491
Cited by
670
References
1
FWCI
16.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A simple procedure for pruning back-propagation trained neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/72.80236
The paper
Karnin, E. D. (1990). A simple procedure for pruning back-propagation trained neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.80236

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.