The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting subscriber dissatisfaction and improving retention in the wireless telecommunications industry
Abstract
Competition in the wireless telecommunications industry is fierce. To maintain profitability, wireless carriers must control churn, which is the loss of subscribers who switch from one carrier to another.We explore techniques from statistical machine learning to predict churn and, based on these predictions, to determine what incentives should be offered to subscribers to improve retention and maximize profitability to the carrier. The techniques include logit regression, decision trees, neural networks, and boosting. Our experiments are based on a database of nearly 47,000 U.S. domestic subscribers and includes information about their usage, billing, credit, application, and complaint history. Our experiments show that under a wide variety of assumptions concerning the cost of intervention and the retention rate resulting from intervention, using predictive techniques to identify potential churners and offering incentives can yield significant savings to a carrier. We also show the importance of a data representation crafted by domain experts. Finally, we report on a real-world test of the techniques that validate our simulation experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287
Cited by
(2001) · Cited by 683
A comparison of machine learning techniques for customer churn prediction
Vafeiadis, T., Diamantaras, K. I., Sarigiannidis, G., & Chatzisavvas, K. C. (2015) · Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory · doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2015.03.003 · Cited by 471
Verbeke, W., Dejaeger, K., Martens, D., Hur, J., & Baesens, B. (2012) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.09.031 · Cited by 462
A novel evolutionary data mining algorithm with applications to churn prediction
Au, W.-H., Chan, K. C. C., & Yao, X. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2003.819264 · Cited by 348
Modeling consumer purchasing behavior in social shopping communities with clickstream data
Olbrich, R., & Holsing, C. (2011) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415160202 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Mozer, M. C., Wolniewicz, R., Grimes, D. B., Johnson, E., & Kaushansky, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 690-696
- ISSN
- 1045-9227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142752589
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting subscriber dissatisfaction and improving retention in the wireless telecommunications industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/72.846740
- The paper
- Mozer, M. C., Wolniewicz, R., Grimes, D. B., Johnson, E., & Kaushansky, H. (2000). Predicting subscriber dissatisfaction and improving retention in the wireless telecommunications industry. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.846740
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.