The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New results on recurrent network training: unifying the algorithms and accelerating convergence
Abstract
How to efficiently train recurrent networks remains a challenging and active research topic. Most of the proposed training approaches are based on computational ways to efficiently obtain the gradient of the error function, and can be generally grouped into five major groups. In this study we present a derivation that unifies these approaches. We demonstrate that the approaches are only five different ways of solving a particular matrix equation. The second goal of this paper is develop a new algorithm based on the insights gained from the novel formulation. The new algorithm, which is based on approximating the error gradient, has lower computational complexity in computing the weight update than the competing techniques for most typical problems. In addition, it reaches the error minimum in a much smaller number of iterations. A desirable characteristic of recurrent network training algorithms is to be able to update the weights in an on-line fashion. We have also developed an on-line version of the proposed algorithm, that is based on updating the error gradient approximation in a recursive manner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Recurrent neural networks and robust time series prediction
Connor, J. T., Martin, R. D., & Atlas, L. E. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.279188 · Cited by 1,316
Cited by
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Reservoir computing approaches to recurrent neural network training
Lukoševičius, M., & Jaeger, H. (2009) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2009.03.005 · Cited by 2,956
An experimental unification of reservoir computing methods
Verstraeten, D., Schrauwen, B., D’Haene, M., & Stroobandt, D. (2007) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2007.04.003 · Cited by 1,135
Generating Coherent Patterns of Activity from Chaotic Neural Networks
Sussillo, D., & Abbott, L. F. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.07.018 · Cited by 1,092
Minimum Complexity Echo State Network
Rodan, A., & Tino, P. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2010.2089641 · Cited by 710
Metadata
- Authors
- Atiya, A. F., & Parlos, A. G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 697-709
- ISSN
- 1045-9227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169762136
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New results on recurrent network training: unifying the algorithms and accelerating convergence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/72.846741
- The paper
- Atiya, A. F., & Parlos, A. G. (2000). New results on recurrent network training: unifying the algorithms and accelerating convergence. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.846741
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.