The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing support vector machines with Gaussian kernels to radial basis function classifiers
Open accessAbstract
The support vector (SV) machine is a novel type of learning machine, based on statistical learning theory, which contains polynomial classifiers, neural networks, and radial basis function (RBF) networks as special cases. In the RBF case, the SV algorithm automatically determines centers, weights, and threshold that minimize an upper bound on the expected test error. The present study is devoted to an experimental comparison of these machines with a classical approach, where the centers are determined by X-means clustering, and the weights are computed using error backpropagation. We consider three machines, namely, a classical RBF machine, an SV machine with Gaussian kernel, and a hybrid system with the centers determined by the SV method and the weights trained by error backpropagation. Our results show that on the United States postal service database of handwritten digits, the SV machine achieves the highest recognition accuracy, followed by the hybrid system. The SV approach is thus not only theoretically well-founded but also superior in a practical application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Self-citationThe Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Self-citationLearning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition
LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J. S., Henderson, D., Howard, R. E., Hubbard, W., & Jackel, L. D. (1989) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 · Cited by 11,891
Cited by
(1999) · doi:10.1162/089976600300015565 · Cited by 2,799
A comprehensive survey on support vector machine classification: Applications, challenges and trends
Cervantes, J., Garcia-Lamont, F., Rodríguez-Mazahua, L., & Lopez, A. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.10.118 · Cited by 2,381
Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: A tutorial overview
Pereira, F., Mitchell, T., & Botvinick, M. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.007 · Cited by 1,624
Pires, D. E. V., Ascher, D. B., & Blundell, T. L. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku411 · Cited by 932
Restoring cortical control of functional movement in a human with quadriplegia
Bouton, C. E., Shaikhouni, A., Annetta, N. V., Bockbrader, M. A., Friedenberg, D. A., Nielson, D. M., Sharma, G., Sederberg, P. B., Glenn, B. C., Mysiw, W. J., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17435 · Cited by 924
Metadata
- Authors
- Scholkopf, B., Sung, K.-K., Burges, C. J. C., Girosi, F., Niyogi, P., Poggio, T., & Vapnik, V.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2758-2765
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055522016
- Cited by
- 1,400
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing support vector machines with Gaussian kernels to radial basis function classifiers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/78.650102
- The paper
- Scholkopf, B., Sung, K.-K., Burges, C. J. C., Girosi, F., Niyogi, P., Poggio, T., & Vapnik, V. (1997). Comparing support vector machines with Gaussian kernels to radial basis function classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/78.650102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.