The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative Fourier analysis of approximation techniques. I. Interpolators and projectors
Open accessAbstract
We present a general Fourier-based method that provides an accurate prediction of the approximation error as a function of the sampling step T. Our formalism applies to an extended class of convolution-based signal approximation techniques, which includes interpolation, generalized sampling with prefiltering, and the projectors encountered in wavelet theory. We claim that we can predict the L/sup 2/-approximation error by integrating the spectrum of the function to approximate-not necessarily bandlimited-against a frequency kernel E(/spl omega/) that characterizes the approximation operator. This prediction is easier yet more precise than was previously available. Our approach has the remarkable property of providing a global error estimate that is the average of the true approximation error over all possible shifts of the input function. Our error prediction is exact for stationary processes, as well as for bandlimited signals. We apply this method to the comparison of standard interpolation and approximation techniques. Our method has interesting implications for approximation theory. In particular, we use our results to obtain some new asymptotic expansions of the error as T/spl rarr/0, as well as to derive improved upper bounds of the kind found in the Strang-Fix (1971) theory. We finally show how we can design quasi-interpolators that are near optimal in the least-squares sense.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Daubechies, I. (1992) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970104 · Cited by 15,979
Splitting the unit delay [FIR/all pass filters design]
Laakso, T. I., Valimaki, V., Karjalainen, M., & Laine, U. K. (1996) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.482137 · Cited by 1,168
Metadata
- Authors
- Blu, T., & Unser, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2783-2795
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163889321
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Fourier analysis of approximation techniques. I. Interpolators and projectors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/78.790659
- The paper
- Blu, T., & Unser, M. (1999). Quantitative Fourier analysis of approximation techniques. I. Interpolators and projectors. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/78.790659
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.