The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Blind image deconvolution
Abstract
The goal of image restoration is to reconstruct the original scene from a degraded observation. This recovery process is critical to many image processing applications. Although classical linear image restoration has been thoroughly studied, the more difficult problem of blind image restoration has numerous research possibilities. We introduce the problem of blind deconvolution for images, provide an overview of the basic principles and methodologies behind the existing algorithms, and examine the current trends and the potential of this difficult signal processing problem. A broad review of blind deconvolution methods for images is given to portray the experience of the authors and of the many other researchers in this area. We first introduce the blind deconvolution problem for general signal processing applications. The specific challenges encountered in image related restoration applications are explained. Analytic descriptions of the structure of the major blind deconvolution approaches for images then follows. The application areas, convergence properties, complexity, and other implementation issues are addressed for each approach. We then discuss the strengths and limitations of various approaches based on theoretical expectations and computer simulations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Understanding and evaluating blind deconvolution algorithms
Levin, A., Weiss, Y., Durand, F., & Freeman, W. T. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206815 · Cited by 1,208
Face swapping: automatically replacing faces in photographs
Bitouk, D., Kumar, N., Dhillon, S., Belhumeur, P., & Nayar, S. K. (2008) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1360612.1360638 · Cited by 333
Total Variation Blind Deconvolution: The Devil Is in the Details
Perrone, D., & Favaro, P. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.372 · Cited by 280
FCNN: Fourier Convolutional Neural Networks
Pratt, H., Williams, B., Coenen, F., & Zheng, Y. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71249-9_47 · Cited by 138
A Clearer Picture of Total Variation Blind Deconvolution
Perrone, D., & Favaro, P. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2477819 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Kundur, D., & Hatzinakos, D.
- Venue
- IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 43-64
- ISSN
- 1053-5888 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027231794
- Cited by
- 1,275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blind image deconvolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/79.489268
- The paper
- Kundur, D., & Hatzinakos, D. (1996). Blind image deconvolution. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/79.489268
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.