The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of large-vocabulary continuous-speech
Abstract
Considerable progress has been made in speech-recognition technology over the last few years and nowhere has this progress been more evident than in the area of large-vocabulary recognition (LVR). Current laboratory systems are capable of transcribing continuous speech from any speaker with average word-error rates between 5% and 10%. If speaker adaptation is allowed, then after 2 or 3 minutes of speech, the error rate will drop well below 5% for most speakers. LVR systems had been limited to dictation applications since the systems were speaker dependent and required words to be spoken with a short pause between them. However, the capability to recognize natural continuous-speech input from any speaker opens up many more applications. As a result, LVR technology appears to be on the brink of widespread deployment across a range of information technology (IT) systems. This article discusses the principles and architecture of current LVR systems and identifies the key issues affecting their future deployment. To illustrate the various points raised, the Cambridge University HTK system is described. This system is a modem design that gives state-of-the-art performance, and it is typical of the current generation of recognition systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Davis, S., & Mermelstein, P. (1980) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tassp.1980.1163420 · Cited by 5,465
(1992) · doi:10.5555/176313.176316 · Cited by 2,892
Cited by
Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., et al. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2205597 · Cited by 10,260
Bidirectional recurrent neural networks
Schuster, M., & Paliwal, K. K. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.650093 · Cited by 10,172
HuBERT: Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning by Masked Prediction of Hidden Units
Hsu, W.-N., Bolte, B., Tsai, Y.-H. H., Lakhotia, K., Salakhutdinov, R., & Mohamed, A. (2021) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2021.3122291 · Cited by 2,983
Evaluating and Informing the Design of Chatbots
Jain, M., Kumar, P., Kota, R., & Patel, S. N. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3196709.3196735 · Cited by 376
On-device personalization of automatic speech recognition models for disordered speech
Tomanek, K., Beaufays, F., Cattiau, J., Chandorkar, A., & Sim, K. C. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.10259 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 45
- ISSN
- 1053-5888 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032210463
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of large-vocabulary continuous-speech. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/79.536824
- The paper
- Young, S. (1996). A review of large-vocabulary continuous-speech. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/79.536824
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.