The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anomaly detection from hyperspectral imagery
Open accessAbstract
We develop anomaly detectors, i.e., detectors that do not presuppose a signature model of one or more dimensions, for three clutter models: the local normal model, the global normal mixture model, and the global linear mixture model. The local normal model treats the neighborhood of a pixel as having a normal probability distribution. The normal mixture model considers the observation from each pixel as arising from one of several possible classes such that each class has a normal probability distribution. The linear mixture model considers each observation to be a linear combination of fixed spectra, known as endmembers, that are, or may be, associated with materials in the scene, and the coefficients, interpreted as fractional abundance, are constrained to be nonnegative and sum to one. We show how the generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT) may be used to derive anomaly detectors for the local normal and global normal mixture models. The anomaly detector applied with the linear mixture approach proceeds by identifying target like endmembers based on properties of the histogram of the abundance estimates and employing a matched filter in the space of abundance estimates. To overcome the limitations of the individual models, we develop a joint decision logic, based on a maximum entropy probability model and the GLRT, that utilizes multiple decision statistics, and we apply this approach using the detection statistics derived from the three clutter models. Examples demonstrate that the joint decision logic can improve detection performance in comparison with the individual anomaly detectors. We also describe the application of linear prediction filters to repeated images of the same area to detect changes that occur within the scene over time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The expectation-maximization algorithm
Moon, T. K. (1996) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.543975 · Cited by 3,181
Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution
Reed, I. S., & Yu, X. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/29.60107 · Cited by 1,867
Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications
Manolakis, D., & Shaw, G. (2002) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.974724 · Cited by 1,116
Scharf, L. L., & Friedlander, B. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.301849 · Cited by 958
(1971) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-07634-7 · Cited by 894
Kraut, S., Scharf, L. L., & McWhorter, L. T. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.890324 · Cited by 734
Automating spectral unmixing of AVIRIS data using convex geometry concepts
Boardman, J. W. (1993) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · Cited by 484
Minimum-volume transforms for remotely sensed data
Craig, M. D. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.297973 · Cited by 468
Adaptive Detection and Parameter Estimation for Multidimensional Signal Models
Kelly, E. J., & Forsythe, K. W. (1989) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · Cited by 288
Automatic Endmember Extraction from Hyperspectral Data for Mineral Exploration
Neville, R. A., Staenz, K., Szeredi, T., Lefebvre, J., & Hauff, P. (1999) · doi:10.4095/219526 · Cited by 255
Cited by
Hyperspectral Unmixing Overview: Geometrical, Statistical, and Sparse Regression-Based Approaches
Bioucas-Dias, J. M., Plaza, A., Dobigeon, N., Parente, M., Du, Q., Gader, P., & Chanussot, J. (2012) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2012.2194696 · Cited by 2,836
Hyperspectral remote sensing data analysis and future challenges
Bioucas-Dias, J. M., Plaza, A., Camps-Valls, G., Scheunders, P., Nasrabadi, N., & Chanussot, J. (2013) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2013.2244672 · Cited by 2,223
Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Dictionary-Based Sparse Representation
Chen, Y., Nasrabadi, N. M., & Tran, T. D. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2011.2129595 · Cited by 1,155
Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications
Manolakis, D., & Shaw, G. (2002) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.974724 · Cited by 1,116
Deep learning classifiers for hyperspectral imaging: A review
Paoletti, M. E., Haut, J. M., Plaza, J., & Plaza, A. (2019) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.09.006 · Cited by 1,073
Metadata
- Authors
- Stein, D. W. J., Beaven, S. G., Hoff, L. E., Winter, E. M., Schaum, A. P., & Stocker, A. D.
- Venue
- IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-69
- ISSN
- 1053-5888 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970099214
- Cited by
- 687
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 41.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anomaly detection from hyperspectral imagery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/79.974730
- The paper
- Stein, D. W. J., Beaven, S. G., Hoff, L. E., Winter, E. M., Schaum, A. P., & Stocker, A. D. (2002). Anomaly detection from hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/79.974730
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.