The DOI matches its Crossref record.
914 MHz path loss prediction models for indoor wireless communications in multifloored buildings
Abstract
Qualitative models are presented that predict the effects of walls, office partitions, floors, and building layout on the path loss at 914 MHz. The site-specific models have been developed based on the number of floors, partitions, and concrete walls between the transmitter and receiver, and provide simple prediction rules which relate signal strength to the log of distance. The standard deviation between measured and predicted path loss is 5.8 dB for the entire data set, and can be as small as 4 dB for specific areas within a building. Average floor attenuation factors, which describe the additional path loss (in decibels) caused by floors between transmitter and receiver, are found for as many as four floors in a typical office building. Path loss contour plots for measured data are presented. In addition, contour plots for the path loss prediction error indicate that the prediction models presented are accurate to within 6 dB for a majority of locations in a building.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system
Bahl, P., & Padmanabhan, V. N. (2002) · Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064) · doi:10.1109/infcom.2000.832252 · Cited by 8,380
A Summary Review of Wireless Sensors and Sensor Networks for Structural Health Monitoring
Lynch, J. P. (2006) · The Shock and Vibration Digest · doi:10.1177/0583102406061499 · Cited by 1,533
A survey of various propagation models for mobile communication
Sarkar, T. K., Ji, Z., Kim, K., Medouri, A., & Salazar-Palma, M. (2003) · IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine · doi:10.1109/map.2003.1232163 · Cited by 909
Propagation measurements and models for wireless communications channels
Andersen, J. B., Rappaport, T. S., & Yoshida, S. (1995) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/35.339880 · Cited by 869
Self-citationWireless Sensing for Human Activity: A Survey
Liu, J., Liu, H., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Wang, C. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2934489 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Seidel, S. Y., & Rappaport, T. S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 207-217
- ISSN
- 0018-926X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149922723
- Cited by
- 925
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 914 MHz path loss prediction models for indoor wireless communications in multifloored buildings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/8.127405
- The paper
- Seidel, S. Y., & Rappaport, T. S. (1992). 914 MHz path loss prediction models for indoor wireless communications in multifloored buildings. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation. https://doi.org/10.1109/8.127405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.