The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An observer looks at synchronization
Open accessAbstract
In the literature on dynamical systems analysis and the control of systems with complex behavior, the topic of synchronization of the response of systems has received considerable attention. This concept is revisited in the light of the classical notion of observers from (non)linear control theory,.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Detecting strange attractors in turbulence
Takens, F. (1981) · Lecture Notes in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/bfb0091924 · Cited by 10,459 · cited 1×
“That a solution to the above synchronization problem, or observer problem, may be feasible under certain conditions may be deduced from the Takens embedding theorem [17],”
Cited by
Control of chaos: Methods and applications in engineering
Fradkov, A. L., & Evans, R. J. (2005) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2005.01.001 · Cited by 403
Chen, W.-H., Luo, S., & Zheng, W. X. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2015.2512849 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Nijmeijer, H., & Mareels, I. M. Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 882-890
- ISSN
- 1057-7122 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161425440
- Cited by
- 683
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An observer looks at synchronization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/81.633877
- The paper
- Nijmeijer, H., & Mareels, I. M. Y. (1997). An observer looks at synchronization. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1109/81.633877
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
