Cited by 747Image and Signal Denoising MethodsImage Enhancement TechniquesAdvanced Data Compression Techniques

Wavelet transform domain filters: a spatially selective noise filtration technique

Yansun Xu, Weaver, J.B., Healy, D.M., Jian Lu·1994·IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Abstract

Wavelet transforms are multiresolution decompositions that can be used to analyze signals and images. They describe a signal by the power at each scale and position. Edges can be located very effectively in the wavelet transform domain. A spatially selective noise filtration technique based on the direct spatial correlation of the wavelet transform at several adjacent scales is introduced. A high correlation is used to infer that there is a significant feature at the position that should be passed through the filter. The authors have tested the technique on simulated signals, phantom images, and real MR images. It is found that the technique can reduce noise contents in signals and images by more than 80% while maintaining at least 80% of the value of the gradient at most edges. The authors did not observe any Gibbs' ringing or significant resolution loss on the filtered images. Artifacts that arose from the filtration are very small and local. The noise filtration technique is quite robust. There are many possible extensions of the technique. The authors see its applications in spatially dependent noise filtration, edge detection and enhancement, image restoration, and motion artifact removal. They have compared the performance of the technique to that of the Weiner filter and found it to be superior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/83.336245

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wavelet smoothing can sharpen an object's edges and restrain noise; moreover, it can enhance the positioning precision of the edges and the depiction of the images.

    “Wavelet smoothing can sharpen an object's edges and restrain noise; moreover, it can enhance the positioning precision of the edges and the depiction of the images.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, Y., Weaver, J. B., Healy, D. M., & Lu, J.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Published
1994
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
747-758
ISSN
1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136017820
Cited by
747
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 35
FWCI
12.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Data Compression Techniques
Keywords
multiresolution decomposition, edge preservation, Gibbs ringing, edge detection, image restoration, motion artifact removal, Wiener filter comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review