Cited by 1,000Image and Signal Denoising MethodsNumerical methods in inverse problemsAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing

Nonlinear image recovery with half-quadratic regularization

Geman, D., Chengda Yang·1995·IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Abstract

One popular method for the recovery of an ideal intensity image from corrupted or indirect measurements is regularization: minimize an objective function that enforces a roughness penalty in addition to coherence with the data. Linear estimates are relatively easy to compute but generally introduce systematic errors; for example, they are incapable of recovering discontinuities and other important image attributes. In contrast, nonlinear estimates are more accurate but are often far less accessible. This is particularly true when the objective function is nonconvex, and the distribution of each data component depends on many image components through a linear operator with broad support. Our approach is based on an auxiliary array and an extended objective function in which the original variables appear quadratically and the auxiliary variables are decoupled. Minimizing over the auxiliary array alone yields the original function so that the original image estimate can be obtained by joint minimization. This can be done efficiently by Monte Carlo methods, for example by FFT-based annealing using a Markov chain that alternates between (global) transitions from one array to the other. Experiments are reported in optical astronomy, with space telescope data, and computed tomography.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/83.392335

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With variable splitting techniques, denoiser prior can be plugged in as a modular part of model-based optimization methods to solve other inverse problems.

    “Recent works have revealed that, with the aid of variable splitting techniques, denoiser prior can be plugged in as a modular part of model-based optimization methods to solve other inverse problems (e.g., deblurring).”

    From Learning Deep CNN Denoiser Prior for Image Restoration (2017) · cites this paper as [28]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geman, D., & Yang, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Published
1995-07
Volume
4
Issue
7
Pages
932-946
ISSN
1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996726072
Cited by
1,000
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 32
FWCI
11.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Numerical methods in inverse problems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Keywords
half-quadratic regularization, non-convex optimization, auxiliary variable method, Markov chain Monte Carlo, image deblurring, space telescope data, computed tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review