The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal Gabor filters for texture segmentation
Abstract
Texture segmentation involves subdividing an image into differently textured regions. Many texture segmentation schemes are based on a filter-bank model, where the filters, called Gabor filters, are derived from Gabor elementary functions. The goal is to transform texture differences into detectable filter-output discontinuities at texture boundaries. By locating these discontinuities, one can segment the image into differently textured regions. Distinct discontinuities occur, however, only if the Gabor filter parameters are suitably chosen. Some previous analysis has shown how to design filters for discriminating simple textures. Designing filters for more general natural textures, though, has largely been done ad hoc. We have devised a more rigorously based method for designing Gabor filters. It assumes that an image contains two different textures and that prototype samples of the textures are given a priori. We argue that Gabor filter outputs can be modeled as Rician random variables (often approximated well as Gaussian rv's) and develop a decision-theoretic algorithm for selecting optimal filter parameters. To improve segmentations for difficult texture pairs, we also propose a multiple-filter segmentation scheme, motivated by the Rician model. Experimental results indicate that our method is superior to previous methods in providing useful Gabor filters for a wide range of texture pairs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Computational Approach to Edge Detection
Canny, J. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851 · Cited by 30,004
Discrete-Time Signal Processing
Oppenheim, A. V., & Schafer, R. W. (1989) · Cited by 11,775
Ballard, D. H., & Brown, C. M. (1982) · Cited by 5,303
Габор, Д. (1946) · Journal of the IEE · Cited by 5,036
Daugman, J. G. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.001160 · Cited by 3,219
Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings
Campbell, F. W., & Robson, J. G. (1968) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008574 · Cited by 3,019
Textures: A Photographic Album for Artists and Designers
Hersey, I., & Brodatz, P. (1968) · Leonardo · doi:10.2307/1571915 · Cited by 2,626
Unsupervised texture segmentation using Gabor filters
Jain, A. K., & Farrokhnia, F. (1991) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/0031-3203(91)90143-s · Cited by 2,182
Multichannel texture analysis using localized spatial filters
Bovik, A. C., Clark, M., & Geisler, W. S. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.41384 · Cited by 1,382
Texture analysis and classification with tree-structured wavelet transform
Chang, T., & Kuo, C.-C. J. (1993) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/83.242353 · Cited by 1,334
Cited by
(1998) · Cited by 540
Optimal Gabor filters for textile flaw detection
Bodnarova, A., Bennamoun, M., & Latham, S. (2002) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/s0031-3203(02)00017-1 · Cited by 175
Park, C., & Won, S. (2009) · 2009 35th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/iecon.2009.5415248 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunn, D., & Higgins, W. E.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 947-964
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126440645
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal Gabor filters for texture segmentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/83.392336
- The paper
- Dunn, D., & Higgins, W. E. (1995). Optimal Gabor filters for texture segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.392336
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.