The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Restoration of a single superresolution image from several blurred, noisy, and undersampled measured images
Abstract
The three main tools in the single image restoration theory are the maximum likelihood (ML) estimator, the maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) estimator, and the set theoretic approach using projection onto convex sets (POCS). This paper utilizes the above known tools to propose a unified methodology toward the more complicated problem of superresolution restoration. In the superresolution restoration problem, an improved resolution image is restored from several geometrically warped, blurred, noisy and downsampled measured images. The superresolution restoration problem is modeled and analyzed from the ML, the MAP, and POCS points of view, yielding a generalization of the known superresolution restoration methods. The proposed restoration approach is general but assumes explicit knowledge of the linear space- and time-variant blur, the (additive Gaussian) noise, the different measured resolutions, and the (smooth) motion characteristics. A hybrid method combining the simplicity of the ML and the incorporation of nonellipsoid constraints is presented, giving improved restoration performance, compared with the ML and the POCS approaches. The hybrid method is shown to converge to the unique optimal solution of a new definition of the optimization problem. Superresolution restoration from motionless measurements is also discussed. Simulations demonstrate the power of the proposed methodology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
NTIRE 2017 Challenge on Single Image Super-Resolution: Dataset and Study
Agustsson, E., & Timofte, R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2017.150 · Cited by 4,295
Image super-resolution: the techniques, applications, and future
Yue, L., Shen, H., Li, J., Yuan, Q., Zhang, H., & Zhang, L. (2016) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.05.002 · Cited by 554
Hallucinating Face by Eigentransformation
Wang, X., & Tang, X. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2005.848171 · Cited by 482
Fundamental limits of reconstruction-based superresolution algorithms under local translation
Lin, Z., & Shum, H.-Y. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2004.1261081 · Cited by 426
A super-resolution reconstruction algorithm for surveillance images
Zhang, L., Zhang, H., Shen, H., & Li, P. (2010) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2009.09.002 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Elad, M., & Feuer, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1646-1658
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W2115548755
- Cited by
- 1,035
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restoration of a single superresolution image from several blurred, noisy, and undersampled measured images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/83.650118
- The paper
- Elad, M., & Feuer, A. (1997). Restoration of a single superresolution image from several blurred, noisy, and undersampled measured images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.650118
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.