Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 751

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nonlinear wavelet image processing: variational problems, compression, and noise removal through wavelet shrinkage

Open access
Chambolle, A., De Vore, R.A., Nam-Yong Lee, Lucier, B.J.·1998·IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between wavelet-based image processing algorithms and variational problems. Algorithms are derived as exact or approximate minimizers of variational problems; in particular, we show that wavelet shrinkage can be considered the exact minimizer of the following problem. Given an image F defined on a square I, minimize over all g in the Besov space B(1)(1)(L (1)(I)) the functional |F-g|(L2)(I)(2)+lambda|g|(B(1)(1 )(L(1(I)))). We use the theory of nonlinear wavelet image compression in L(2)(I) to derive accurate error bounds for noise removal through wavelet shrinkage applied to images corrupted with i.i.d., mean zero, Gaussian noise. A new signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which we claim more accurately reflects the visual perception of noise in images, arises in this derivation. We present extensive computations that support the hypothesis that near-optimal shrinkage parameters can be derived if one knows (or can estimate) only two parameters about an image F: the largest alpha for which FinEpsilon(q)(alpha )(L(q)(I)),1/q=alpha/2+1/2, and the norm |F|B(q)(alpha)(L(q)(I)). Both theoretical and experimental results indicate that our choice of shrinkage parameters yields uniformly better results than Donoho and Johnstone's VisuShrink procedure; an example suggests, however, that Donoho and Johnstone's SureShrink method, which uses a different shrinkage parameter for each dyadic level, achieves a lower error than our procedure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/83.661182

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 751

Metadata

Authors
Chambolle, A., De Vore, R. A., Lee, N.-Y., & Lucier, B. J.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Published
1998-03
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
319-335
ISSN
  • 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0042
OpenAlex
W2158252006
Cited by
751
References
2
FWCI
22.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear wavelet image processing: variational problems, compression, and noise removal through wavelet shrinkage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/83.661182
The paper
Chambolle, A., De Vore, R. A., Lee, N.-Y., & Lucier, B. J. (1998). Nonlinear wavelet image processing: variational problems, compression, and noise removal through wavelet shrinkage. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.661182

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.