The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Filterbank-based fingerprint matching
Abstract
With identity fraud in our society reaching unprecedented proportions and with an increasing emphasis on the emerging automatic personal identification applications, biometrics-based verification, especially fingerprint-based identification, is receiving a lot of attention. There are two major shortcomings of the traditional approaches to fingerprint representation. For a considerable fraction of population, the representations based on explicit detection of complete ridge structures in the fingerprint are difficult to extract automatically. The widely used minutiae-based representation does not utilize a significant component of the rich discriminatory information available in the fingerprints. Local ridge structures cannot be completely characterized by minutiae. Further, minutiae-based matching has difficulty in quickly matching two fingerprint images containing a different number of unregistered minutiae points. The proposed filter-based algorithm uses a bank of Gabor filters to capture both local and global details in a fingerprint as a compact fixed length FingerCode. The fingerprint matching is based on the Euclidean distance between the two corresponding FingerCodes and hence is extremely fast. We are able to achieve a verification accuracy which is only marginally inferior to the best results of minutiae-based algorithms published in the open literature. Our system performs better than a state-of-the-art minutiae-based system when the performance requirement of the application system does not demand a very low false acceptance rate. Finally, we show that the matching performance can be improved by combining the decisions of the matchers based on complementary (minutiae-based and filter-based) fingerprint information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Daugman, J. G. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.001160 · Cited by 3,219
A graduated assignment algorithm for graph matching
Gold, S., & Rangarajan, A. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.491619 · Cited by 1,090
Cited by
Systematic methods for the computation of the directional fields and singular points of fingerprints
Bazen, A. M., & Gerez, S. H. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2002.1017618 · Cited by 601
Photoplethysmography: New trends and future directions
Kyriacou, P. A., & May, J. M. (2022) · Photoplethysmography · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-823374-0.00012-8 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Jain, A. K., Prabhakar, S., Hong, L., & Pankanti, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 846-859
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109131581
- Cited by
- 1,106
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 30.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Filterbank-based fingerprint matching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/83.841531
- The paper
- Jain, A. K., Prabhakar, S., Hong, L., & Pankanti, S. (2000). Filterbank-based fingerprint matching. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.841531
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.