The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Curve evolution implementation of the Mumford-Shah functional for image segmentation, denoising, interpolation, and magnification
Abstract
In this work, we first address the problem of simultaneous image segmentation and smoothing by approaching the Mumford-Shah paradigm from a curve evolution perspective. In particular, we let a set of deformable contours define the boundaries between regions in an image where we model the data via piecewise smooth functions and employ a gradient flow to evolve these contours. Each gradient step involves solving an optimal estimation problem for the data within each region, connecting curve evolution and the Mumford-Shah functional with the theory of boundary-value stochastic processes. The resulting active contour model offers a tractable implementation of the original Mumford-Shah model (i.e., without resorting to elliptic approximations which have traditionally been favored for greater ease in implementation) to simultaneously segment and smoothly reconstruct the data within a given image in a coupled manner. Various implementations of this algorithm are introduced to increase its speed of convergence. We also outline a hierarchical implementation of this algorithm to handle important image features such as triple points and other multiple junctions. Next, by generalizing the data fidelity term of the original Mumford-Shah functional to incorporate a spatially varying penalty, we extend our method to problems in which data quality varies across the image and to images in which sets of pixel measurements are missing. This more general model leads us to a novel PDE-based approach for simultaneous image magnification, segmentation, and smoothing, thereby extending the traditional applications of the Mumford-Shah functional which only considers simultaneous segmentation and smoothing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Multiphase Level Set Framework for Image Segmentation Using the Mumford and Shah Model
Vese, L. A., & Chan, T. F. (2002) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1020874308076 · Cited by 2,384
Active contours driven by local image fitting energy
Zhang, K., Song, H., & Zhang, L. (2010) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2009.10.010 · Cited by 721
Active contours driven by local Gaussian distribution fitting energy
Wang, L., He, L., Mishra, A., & Li, C. (2009) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2009.03.014 · Cited by 466
The Use of Mobile Devices in Aiding Dietary Assessment and Evaluation
Zhu, F., Bosch, M., Woo, I., Kim, S., Boushey, C. J., Ebert, D. S., & Delp, E. J. (2010) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2010.2051471 · Cited by 355
A Likelihood and Local Constraint Level Set Model for Liver Tumor Segmentation from CT Volumes
Li, C., Wang, X., Eberl, S., Fulham, M., Yin, Y., Chen, J., & Feng, D. D. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2013.2267212 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsai, A., Yezzi, A., & Willsky, A. S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1169-1186
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148395215
- Cited by
- 841
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Curve evolution implementation of the Mumford-Shah functional for image segmentation, denoising, interpolation, and magnification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/83.935033
- The paper
- Tsai, A., Yezzi, A., & Willsky, A. S. (2001). Curve evolution implementation of the Mumford-Shah functional for image segmentation, denoising, interpolation, and magnification. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/83.935033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.