Cited by 136Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringMuscle activation and electromyography studiesVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

Quantification of recruitment properties of multiple contact cuff electrodes

Grill, W.M., Mortimer, J.T.·1996·IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

Nerve-based stimulating electrodes provide the technology for advancing the function of motor system neural prostheses. The goal of this work was to measure and quantify the recruitment properties of a 12 contact spiral nerve cuff electrode. The cuff was implanted on the cat sciatic nerve trunk, which consists of at least four distinct motor fascicles, and the torque generated at the ankle joint by selective stimulation of the nerve was recorded in nine acute experiments. Comparisons of torques generated with the cuff to torques generated by selective stimulation of individual nerve branches indicated that the cuff allowed selective activation of individual nerve fascicles. Selectivity was dependent on the relative location of the electrode contacts and the nerve fascicles, as well as the size and relative spacing of neighboring fascicles. Selective stimulation of individual nerve fascicles allowed independent and graded control of dorsiflexion and plantarflexion torques in all nine experiments. Field steering currents improved selectivity as reflected by significant increases in the maximum torques that could be generated before spillover to other fascicles, significant increases in the difference between the current amplitude at spillover and the current amplitude at threshold, and significant increases in the slope of the current distance relationship.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/86.506402

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Motor units in their absolute refractory period, which lasts between 1.5 and 2.1 ms, will not respond to stimulation.

    “Another method for quantifying selectivity takes advantage of the concept that motor units in their absolute refractory period, which lasts between 1.5 and 2.1 ms, will not respond to stimulation [1,3,6,11-15].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 136

Authors
Grill, W. M., & Mortimer, J. T.
Affiliations
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
1996-06
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
49-62
ISSN
  • 1063-6528 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0024
OpenAlex
W2098687727
Cited by
136
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (N01-NS-3-2300)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
cuff electrodes, neurostimulation, selective stimulation, sciatic nerve, ankle torque, spillover effects, dorsiflexion, plantar flexion
MeSH terms
Animals, Ankle Joint, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cats, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Prosthesis Design, Recruitment, Neurophysiological, Sciatic Nerve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review