Quantification of recruitment properties of multiple contact cuff electrodes
Abstract
Nerve-based stimulating electrodes provide the technology for advancing the function of motor system neural prostheses. The goal of this work was to measure and quantify the recruitment properties of a 12 contact spiral nerve cuff electrode. The cuff was implanted on the cat sciatic nerve trunk, which consists of at least four distinct motor fascicles, and the torque generated at the ankle joint by selective stimulation of the nerve was recorded in nine acute experiments. Comparisons of torques generated with the cuff to torques generated by selective stimulation of individual nerve branches indicated that the cuff allowed selective activation of individual nerve fascicles. Selectivity was dependent on the relative location of the electrode contacts and the nerve fascicles, as well as the size and relative spacing of neighboring fascicles. Selective stimulation of individual nerve fascicles allowed independent and graded control of dorsiflexion and plantarflexion torques in all nine experiments. Field steering currents improved selectivity as reflected by significant increases in the maximum torques that could be generated before spillover to other fascicles, significant increases in the difference between the current amplitude at spillover and the current amplitude at threshold, and significant increases in the slope of the current distance relationship.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Motor units in their absolute refractory period, which lasts between 1.5 and 2.1 ms, will not respond to stimulation.
“Another method for quantifying selectivity takes advantage of the concept that motor units in their absolute refractory period, which lasts between 1.5 and 2.1 ms, will not respond to stimulation [1,3,6,11-15].”
From Optimization of selective stimulation parameters for multi-contact electrodes (2013) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 136
- Authors
- Grill, W. M., & Mortimer, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 49-62
- ISSN
- 1063-6528 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0024
- OpenAlex
- W2098687727
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (N01-NS-3-2300)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
- Keywords
- cuff electrodes, neurostimulation, selective stimulation, sciatic nerve, ankle torque, spillover effects, dorsiflexion, plantar flexion
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Ankle Joint, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cats, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Prosthesis Design, Recruitment, Neurophysiological, Sciatic Nerve
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review