The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outliers in process modeling and identification
Abstract
Model-based control strategies like model predictive control (MPC) require models of process dynamics accurate enough that the resulting controllers perform adequately in practice. Often, these models are obtained by fitting convenient model structures (e.g., linear finite impulse response (FIR) models, linear pole-zero models, nonlinear Hammerstein or Wiener models, etc.) to observed input-output data. Real measurement data records frequently contain "outliers" or "anomalous data points," which can badly degrade the results of an otherwise reasonable empirical model identification procedure. This paper considers some real datasets containing outliers, examines the influence of outliers on linear and nonlinear system identification, and discusses the problems of outlier detection and data cleaning. Although no single strategy is universally applicable, the Hampel filter described here is often extremely effective in practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725153 · Cited by 7,297
Huber, P. J. (1981) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725250 · Cited by 7,066
The identification of multiple outliers
Davies, L., & Gather, U. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10476339 · Cited by 709
Cited by
Data-driven Soft Sensors in the process industry
Kadlec, P., Gabrys, B., & Strandt, S. (2009) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2008.12.012 · Cited by 1,845
The Harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 surface reflectance data set
Claverie, M., Ju, J., Masek, J. G., Dungan, J. L., Vermote, E. F., Roger, J.-C., Skakun, S. V., & Justice, C. (2018) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2018.09.002 · Cited by 1,497
Review of adaptation mechanisms for data-driven soft sensors
Kadlec, P., Grbić, R., & Gabrys, B. (2011) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2010.07.034 · Cited by 517
Validation of Collection 6 MODIS land surface temperature product using in situ measurements
Duan, S.-B., Li, Z.-L., Li, H., Göttsche, F.-M., Wu, H., Zhao, W., Leng, P., Zhang, X., & Coll, C. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.020 · Cited by 442
On-line outlier detection and data cleaning
LIU, H. (2004) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/s0098-1354(04)00024-9 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearson, R. K.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-63
- ISSN
- 1063-6536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108587916
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outliers in process modeling and identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/87.974338
- The paper
- Pearson, R. K. (2002). Outliers in process modeling and identification. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/87.974338
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.