The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Minimum classification error rate methods for speech recognition
Abstract
A critical component in the pattern matching approach to speech recognition is the training algorithm, which aims at producing typical (reference) patterns or models for accurate pattern comparison. In this paper, we discuss the issue of speech recognizer training from a broad perspective with root in the classical Bayes decision theory. We differentiate the method of classifier design by way of distribution estimation and the discriminative method of minimizing classification error rate based on the fact that in many realistic applications, such as speech recognition, the real signal distribution form is rarely known precisely. We argue that traditional methods relying on distribution estimation are suboptimal when the assumed distribution form is not the true one, and that "optimality" in distribution estimation does not automatically translate into "optimality" in classifier design. We compare the two different methods in the context of hidden Markov modeling for speech recognition. We show the superiority of the minimum classification error (MCE) method over the distribution estimation method by providing the results of several key speech recognition experiments. In general, the MCE method provides a significant reduction of recognition error rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
A Stochastic Approximation Method
Robbins, H., & Monro, S. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729586 · Cited by 9,643
Maximum mutual information estimation of hidden Markov model parameters for speech recognition
Bahl, L., Brown, P., de Souza, P., & Mercer, R. (2005) · ICASSP '86. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.1986.1169179 · Cited by 817
Cited by
Deep Learning: Methods and Applications
Deng, L., & Yu, D. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Signal Processing · doi:10.1561/2000000039 · Cited by 3,480
Context-dependent pre-trained deep neural networks for large-vocabulary speech recognition
Dahl, G. E., Yu, D., Deng, L., & Acero, A. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/tasl.2011.2134090 · Cited by 3,011
AttnGAN: Fine-Grained Text to Image Generation with Attentional Generative Adversarial Networks
Xu, T., Zhang, P., Huang, Q., Zhang, H., Gan, Z., Huang, X., & He, X. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00143 · Cited by 1,923
Deep Learning: Methods and Applications
Deng, L. (2014) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601988157 · Cited by 1,759
Stacked Cross Attention for Image-Text Matching
Lee, K.-H., Chen, X., Hua, G., Hu, H., & He, X. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01225-0_13 · Cited by 1,402
Metadata
- Authors
- Juang, B.-H., Hou, W., & Lee, C.-H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 257-265
- ISSN
- 1063-6676 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158289097
- Cited by
- 618
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minimum classification error rate methods for speech recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/89.568732
- The paper
- Juang, B.-H., Hou, W., & Lee, C.-H. (1997). Minimum classification error rate methods for speech recognition. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/89.568732
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.