Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modeling of the glottal flow derivative waveform with application to speaker identification

Open access
Plumpe, M.D., Quatieri, T.F., Reynolds, D.A.·1999·IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing

Abstract

An automatic technique for estimating and modeling the glottal flow derivative source waveform from speech, and applying the model parameters to speaker identification, is presented. The estimate of the glottal flow derivative is decomposed into coarse structure, representing the general flow shape, and fine structure, comprising aspiration and other perturbations in the flow, from which model parameters are obtained. The glottal flow derivative is estimated using an inverse filter determined within a time interval of vocal-fold closure that is identified through differences in formant frequency modulation during the open and closed phases of the glottal cycle. This formant motion is predicted by Ananthapadmanabha and Fant (1982) to be a result of time-varying and nonlinear source/vocal tract coupling within a glottal cycle. The glottal flow derivative estimate is modeled using the Liljencrants-Fant (1986) model to capture its coarse structure, while the fine structure of the flow derivative is represented through energy and perturbation measures. The model parameters are used in a Gaussian mixture model speaker identification (SID) system. Both coarse- and fine-structure glottal features are shown to contain significant speaker-dependent information. For a large TIMIT database subset, averaging over male and female SID scores, the coarse-structure parameters achieve about 60% accuracy, the fine-structure parameters give about 40% accuracy, and their combination yields about 70% correct identification. Finally, in preliminary experiments on the counterpart telephone-degraded NTIMIT database, about a 5% error reduction in SID scores is obtained when source features are combined with traditional mel-cepstral measures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/89.784109

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Plumpe, M. D., Quatieri, T. F., & Reynolds, D. A.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing
Published
1999
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
569-586
ISSN
1063-6676 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118209063
Cited by
286
References
40
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling of the glottal flow derivative waveform with application to speaker identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/89.784109
The paper
Plumpe, M. D., Quatieri, T. F., & Reynolds, D. A. (1999). Modeling of the glottal flow derivative waveform with application to speaker identification. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/89.784109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.