The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An analysis of temporal-difference learning with function approximation
Open accessAbstract
We discuss the temporal-difference learning algorithm, as applied to approximating the cost-to-go function of an infinite-horizon discounted Markov chain. The algorithm we analyze updates parameters of a linear function approximator online during a single endless trajectory of an irreducible aperiodic Markov chain with a finite or infinite state space. We present a proof of convergence (with probability one), a characterization of the limit of convergence, and a bound on the resulting approximation error. Furthermore, our analysis is based on a new line of reasoning that provides new intuition about the dynamics of temporal-difference learning. In addition to proving new and stronger positive results than those previously available, we identify the significance of online updating and potential hazards associated with the use of nonlinear function approximators. First, we prove that divergence may occur when updates are not based on trajectories of the Markov chain. This fact reconciles positive and negative results that have been discussed in the literature, regarding the soundness of temporal-difference learning. Second, we present an example illustrating the possibility of divergence when temporal difference learning is used in the presence of a nonlinear function approximator.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Watkins, C. J. C. H., & Dayan, P. (1992) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00992698 · Cited by 9,083
Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences
Sutton, R. S. (1988) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00115009 · Cited by 5,148
Cited by
Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning
Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14236 · Cited by 30,357
Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning
Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Graves, A., Antonoglou, I., Wierstra, D., & Riedmiller, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.5602 · Cited by 9,471
Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Brief Survey
Arulkumaran, K., Deisenroth, M. P., Brundage, M., & Bharath, A. A. (2017) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2017.2743240 · Cited by 4,733
Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-Learning
Van Hasselt, H., Guez, A., & Silver, D. (2016) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10295 · Cited by 3,318
Reinforcement learning in robotics: A survey
Kober, J., Bagnell, J. A., & Peters, J. (2013) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364913495721 · Cited by 3,160
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsitsiklis, J. N., & Van Roy, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 674-690
- ISSN
- 0018-9286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139418546
- Cited by
- 1,194
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An analysis of temporal-difference learning with function approximation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/9.580874
- The paper
- Tsitsiklis, J. N., & Van Roy, B. (1997). An analysis of temporal-difference learning with function approximation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/9.580874
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.